Thariq@trq212 · 37分钟前48

I've heard a lot of questions about Fable's availability on subscription plans. While it will come off subscriptions after July 7th, we aim to restore Fable as a standard part of our subscriptions as soon as capacity allows, as we mentioned in our original blog post.

译我听到很多关于Fable在订阅计划中可用性的问题。 虽然它将在7月7日后从订阅中移除，但正如我们在最初博客文章中提到的，我们旨在尽快在容量允许的情况下将Fable恢复为我们订阅的标准部分。

ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs · 23分钟前53

We've raised Claude Platform API rate limits for all users and simplified the tiers, which are no longer based on API spend. The latest Sonnet and Haiku models now provide 5x higher rate limits at the highest tier.

译我们已为所有用户提升 Claude Platform API 速率限制并简化层级，不再基于 API 消费额。最新的 Sonnet 和 Haiku 模型在最高层级提供 5 倍更高的速率限制。

Boris Cherny@bcherny · 3小时前57

Artifacts in Claude Code have been life changing. Excited to expand to Pro and Max!

译Claude Code 中的 Artifacts 改变了我的生活。很兴奋它扩展到 Pro 和 Max！

🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog@testingcatalog · 3小时前61

Claude Pro and Max users can now access Artifacts on Claude Code as well. > Interactive pages built from your session, like a PR walkthrough or a living project dashboard, shared with your team at a private link. Available in beta on Team and Enterprise plans. Everything is an Artifact 👀

译Claude Code 的 Artifacts 功能现对 Pro 和 Max 计划用户开放。用户可请求 artifact，Claude 自动编写代码并实时发布到 claude.ai，同时持续更新。页面为账户私有且完全自包含，此前该功能仅在 Team 和 Enterprise 计划中提供 beta 版本。

Ethan Mollick@emollick · 3小时前77

The talk about Mythos and cybersecurity was not, in fact, hype. (As anyone using Fable to do autonomous work has probably recognized)

译关于Mythos和网络安全的讨论并非炒作。 （正如任何使用Fable进行自主工作的人可能已经认识到的那样。）

Chubby♨️@kimmonismus · 2小时前61

I guess Mythos’ cybersecurity capabilities weren’t overhyped. Mythos is great, and Fable is excellent. It’s just a shame that it’s so heavily guardrailed.

译我想Mythos的网络安全能力并没有被夸大。Mythos很棒，Fable也很出色。只可惜它被严格限制了。

ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs · 3小时前59

Artifacts in Claude Code are now also available on Pro and Max plans. Ask for an artifact, Claude writes the code, publishes it live to claude.a‍i, and updates it in real time while it keeps working. Pages are private to your account and fully self-contained.

译Claude Code 中的 Artifacts 现在也适用于 Pro 和 Max 计划。 提出一个 artifact，Claude 编写代码，将其实时发布到 claude.a‍i，并在继续工作的同时实时更新。页面对你的账户私有且完全自包含。

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai · 4小时前51

This may be an extreme case but it still shows how quickly Fable 5 classifiers can reroute routine coding to Opus. The session routed 75% of its work to Opus because the new classifiers kept misreading the coding prompts here as a cybersecurity issue.

译用户 @bridgemindai 披露一次编码会话花费 $321，其中 Fable 5 仅完成 $78（约 25%），而 Opus 4.8 被回退调用完成 $242（约 75%）。原因在于 Fable 5 的新分类器将常规编码提示误判为网络安全风险，导致大部分工作自动路由到更昂贵的 Opus 模型。Anthropic 曾称仅极少数任务会触发 fallback，但该用户实际体验与此不符。

🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog@testingcatalog · 5小时前58

Anthropic 🤝 Samsung Anthropic may develop its own AI chip with Samsung, according to The Information. > OpenAI recently announced their own AI chip developed in a partnership with Broadcom. Everyone is going full stack 👀

译Anthropic 🤝 Samsung 据The Information报道，Anthropic可能与三星合作开发自己的AI芯片。 > OpenAI近日宣布与Broadcom合作开发自有AI芯片。 大家都在走向全栈 👀

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai · 6小时前65

Feels like an end of era, ordinary people will probably never again get upgraded frontier models. Fable 5’s return shows how safety routing can downgrade a frontier model. Now we only permissioned intelligence. The cost of putting a gatekeeper inside intelligence. To note, that safeguard is not a simple refusal layer; it is a classifier that sends flagged Fable 5 requests to Opus 4.8. Fable 5 came back, but the old promise did not. End of an era. ☹️

译Anthropic的Claude Fable 5（7月1日版）回归后在BridgeBench重测中表现大幅下滑：Debugging从86.2暴跌至25.9，Refactoring从73.6降至38.4，Hallucination从75.9滑落至61.7。原因是新安全护栏并非简单拒绝层，而是将标记请求路由至较弱的Opus 4.8，导致大量任务回退。Rohan Paul评论称这标志着普通人可能再也无法获得升级的前沿模型，如今只有“许可智能”。

Claude@claudeai · 6小时前35

A conversation with Boris Cherny and Cat Wu on the path from Claude Code to Claude Tag, and how it spread from engineering to the rest of Anthropic. Claude Fable 5 is now available in Claude Tag.

译与 Boris Cherny 和 Cat Wu 关于从 Claude Code 到 Claude Tag 的路径，以及它如何从工程团队扩展到 Anthropic 其他部门的对话。 Claude Fable 5 现已在 Claude Tag 中可用。

Ethan Mollick@emollick · 6小时前49

Fable in Claude Code is capable of really amazing things, including for non-coders, but the interface is not really designed for managing 5+ hour long autonomous tasks. Really hard to observe what is happening and intervene in real time, you often have to wait until the outputs.

译Fable in Claude Code 确实能做到非常惊人的事情，包括非程序员也可以用，但界面并不是为管理5小时以上的自主任务而设计的。很难实时观察发生了什么并干预，你经常必须等到输出。

Chubby♨️@kimmonismus · 6小时前29

seriously wtf anthropic? No wonder they were able to re-release Fable 5.

译Fable 5 不是被削弱，而是被屠杀了。问题甚至不在于模型本身，而在于 Anthropic 设置的硬性护栏。网友对此表示震惊。

Berryxia.AI@berryxia · 7小时前13

此刻，关灯了，躺在被窝里。 用手机远程操作电脑指挥Claude Fable 5 干活。 偷感十足，因为老婆已经睡了。 不让在被窝玩手机😂

Emad@EMostaque · 6小时前23

OpenAI and Anthropic should put 10% of their equity each in Invest America accounts for the children of the USA Valuation will go up more than 10%

译OpenAI和Anthropic应各自将10%的股权投入Invest America账户，用于美国儿童。

Chubby♨️@kimmonismus · 7小时前75

Anthropic’s Pentagon fight was less about access to Claude than control over how the military can use frontier AI. New WSJ-reported court documents show months of emails between Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and Pentagon undersecretary Emil Michael over guardrails for AI-powered weapons and domestic surveillance. Anthropic wanted bans on fully autonomous weapons and certain surveillance uses. The Pentagon pushed for Claude to be available across all lawful national-security use cases. Michael reportedly said he did not want to "force anything unnatural" if the sides were too far apart. The Pentagon later labeled Anthropic a supply-chain risk, effectively blocking partners from using its models in Defense Department work. A judge has paused parts of that move, but the government is appealing. Michael says two-thirds of Pentagon operations using Anthropic have already switched to other AI tools.

译WSJ法庭文件显示，Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei与五角大楼副部长Emil Michael数月邮件往来，核心分歧在于Claude的军事用途护栏。Anthropic要求禁止全自主武器及某些监控用途，五角大楼则希望Claude可用于所有合法国家安全场景。Michael称若分歧太大不愿“强行推动”。随后五角大楼将Anthropic列为供应链风险，阻止合作伙伴在国防部项目中使用其模型。法官暂停部分措施，政府正在上诉。Michael称原先采用Anthropic的操作中已有三分之二切换至其他AI工具。

Chubby♨️@kimmonismus · 7小时前70

Anthropic’s Pentagon fight was less about access to Claude than control over how the military can use frontier AI. New WSJ-reported court documents show months of emails between Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and Pentagon undersecretary Emil Michael over guardrails for AI-powered weapons and domestic surveillance. Anthropic wanted bans on fully autonomous weapons and certain surveillance uses. The Pentagon pushed for Claude to be available across all lawful national-security use cases. Michael reportedly said he did not want to "force anything unnatural" if the sides were too far apart. The Pentagon later labeled Anthropic a supply-chain risk, effectively blocking partners from using its models in Defense Department work. A judge has paused parts of that move, but the government is appealing. Michael says two-thirds of Pentagon operations using Anthropic have already switched to other AI tools.

译WSJ报道的法院文件显示，Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei与五角大楼副部长Emil Michael就AI武器和监控护栏进行了数月邮件往来。Anthropic要求禁止全自主武器及特定监控用途，五角大楼则希望Claude可用于所有合法国家安全场景。Michael称不愿“强行扭曲”。五角大楼随后将Anthropic列为供应链风险，阻碍其模型用于国防部工作。法官暂停部分措施，但政府已上诉。Michael表示，使用Anthropic的五角大楼业务中已有三分之二转向其他AI工具。

数字生命卡兹克@Khazix0918 · 8小时前63

看着Claude fable 5为了解决问题，自己去火山引擎上提交工单然后跟火山的工程师交流给我看懵逼了。。。。

译看着Claude fable 5为了解决问题，自己去火山引擎上提交工单，然后跟火山的工程师交流，给我看懵了。。。。

Chubby♨️@kimmonismus · 9小时前55

Huge:Anthropic is reportedly in early talks with Samsung to manufacture its own custom AI chip. The Information says the Claude maker is still figuring out what the processor should do, how powerful it should be, and how it would fit into servers or clusters. Anthropic already uses AWS Trainium, Google TPUs, and Nvidia GPUs, and says those will remain central. A custom chip would give it another lever as model deployment costs, data-center capacity, memory supply, and power all become strategic constraints. Samsung would get a high-profile AI foundry customer for its 2-nanometer process and advanced packaging push.

译The Information报道，Anthropic正与三星早期洽谈制造自研AI芯片，目前仍在规划芯片功能、算力及服务器/集群适配方案。Anthropic现有AWS Trainium、Google TPU、Nvidia GPU仍为核心，自研芯片将作为应对模型部署成本、数据中心容量、内存供应、电力等战略约束的新杠杆。三星借此获得高端AI代工客户，推动其2纳米制程和先进封装业务。

Chubby♨️@kimmonismus · 8小时前26

Since Fable 5 is expensive, smart routing acts as a moat.

译Claude Fable 5 已回归 AI 平台 ZenMux，并开放免费试用。ZenMux 同步推出 Auto Top-up Bonus 活动：充值可获 20% 额外积分，每人最多 3 次奖励，每次最高 $100，总计 $300。主推文指出，由于 Fable 5 价格昂贵，智能路由（smart routing）功能成为平台的护城河，能够有效降低成本。

AYi@AYi_AInotes · 10小时前54

Damn！网页设计师的护城河，一夜之间又塌了一块。 只用 Claude Code 加 Sonnet 5，十八分钟就能做出获奖级的完整网站，从设计感到代码完成度全部拉满。 以前我们总说 AI 做的东西有模板味，上不了台面，现在模型的 Agent 能力上来之后，复杂的多步设计任务也能稳定落地，质感和完成度都跨过了专业门槛。 我觉得未来倒不是说AI 一定会取代设计师，而是说以后不会用 AI 的设计师会先被会用的同行甩开一大截， 因为执行层的价值正在快速坍缩，审美和判断才是接下来真正的硬通货。 https://x.com/viktoroddy/status/2072290912085123326/video/1

译推文指出，使用 Claude Code 加 Sonnet 5 仅 18 分钟就能做出获奖级的完整网站，设计与代码完成度均达到专业水准。Agent 能力提升后，复杂多步设计任务可稳定落地，质感跨越专业门槛。未来不会用 AI 的设计师将被会用的同行甩开，执行层价值加速坍缩，审美与判断力成为真正的硬通货。

Claude@claudeai · 9小时前29

Announcing Built with Claude: Life Sciences, a global virtual hackathon. Join us and @GladstoneInst for a week of researching and building with Claude Science and Claude Code, with a prize pool of $100k in credits.

译宣布「Built with Claude: Life Sciences」全球虚拟黑客马拉松。 与我们和@GladstoneInst一起，用Claude Science和Claude Code进行一周的研究与构建，奖金池为10万美元信用额度。

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai · 10小时前52

You can now create ads directly inside Slack. Arcads turns Slack into an AI ad studio that also researches competitors and generates creatives. Claude Tag lets Slack users tag @ Claude and delegate work across connected channels and tools. MCP gives Claude a controlled way to call Arcads skills from Slack. Veo 3.1, Kling Motion Control, Nano Banana, and Sora 2 Pro become accessible from one interface.

译Arcads 将 Slack 转化为 AI 广告工作室，用户可直接在 Slack 内创建广告、研究竞争对手并生成创意。支持 Claude Tag（@Claude 跨频道跨工具委派任务）和 MCP（让 Claude 从 Slack 安全调用 Arcads 技能）。同一界面可调用 Veo 3.1、Kling Motion Control、Nano Banana、Sora 2 Pro 等视频生成工具。官方宣布 Claude x Arcads in Slack 即日上线，用户可在 Slack DM 中获取病毒式广告。

AYi@AYi_AInotes · 11小时前53

今天也是豪横了一把，实现了Fable 5自由，这可是全球最顶最硬最牛逼的AI大模型啊，比Opus 4.8贵6倍， 多用一分钟都能立省100块哈哈哈， 我跑测下来觉得确实实至名归，真的非常屌炸天，他给我的提示词喂给GPT-iamge-2，0抽卡，一次出片 现在可以免费用， 另外Claude Sonnet 5免费用， Gemini Nano banana 2 lite也免费用， 速冲！！

译传闻中的顶级模型Claude Fable 5在ZenMux平台回归上线并限时免费，官方价格高达50美元/百万token，ZenMux上则零成本使用且无RPM限制。用户分享了一套利用Fable 5生成高质量人像提示词的方法论：先分析AI人像塑料感根源，再搭建涵盖主体人设、服装材质、表情瞬间等8个维度的框架，最后输出示例并自我修正。此外，ZenMux还免费提供Claude Sonnet 5和Gemini Nano banana 2 lite，支持同屏对比Fable 5、GPT-5.5、Opus 4.8等200+模型，自动充值每笔返20%余额（最高300美元赠金）。

Chubby♨️@kimmonismus · 13小时前14

It would be sad if it weren't so funny.

译如果这不好笑，那才可悲。 @TimSweeneyEpic 感谢 Claude Fable 5 保障了他们的安全。

Berryxia.AI@berryxia · 17小时前46

现在Cursor里面也可以使用Fable 5 ，也不怕封号😄

译Fable 5 现已可在 Cursor 中使用，用户表示不再担心封号问题。此前群友发现 Claude 桌面端也已支持 Fable 5，但部分用户尚未看到该选项。

数字生命卡兹克@Khazix0918 · 17小时前30

这7天可能时间价值最高的事： 用Claude Fable 5把你的所有的工作流、SOP、Skill、项目方案、项目代码全部优化迭代一遍。 已经明显能感觉到200刀的Max账号不够烧了，1个半小时就见底了。。。 于是又注册了一个号的200刀Max，用力蹬这7天。。。

译卡兹克建议将工作流、SOP、Skill、项目方案及代码全部用Claude Fable 5迭代优化。他称200刀Max账号仅1个半小时即烧完，于是又注册了一个新号，力争在7天内充分利用。

Berryxia.AI@berryxia · 21小时前42

Fable5 回来了，限时一周。 https://x.com/claudeai/status/2072402636813607381?s=20

歸藏(guizang.ai)@op7418 · 21小时前38

Fable 5 重新上线了

Berryxia.AI@berryxia · 21小时前40

Fable5 回来了，限时1周。https://x.com/claudeai/status/2072402636813607381?s=20

译有用户已能在Claude桌面端使用Fable5，但并非所有人都已开放。Fable5回来了，限时1周。

小互@xiaohu · 22小时前43

Fable 5 只有一周使用时间 过后就只能通过API 来使用，无法使用订阅的用量 另外Claude 今天重置了所有人的用量 可劲造吧

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai · 1天前53

Fable 5 absolutely crushed the HTML5 physics contest, but cost 6x more than Opus 4.8 and 39× more than GLM 5.2 in that test. Test was done on atomic[.]chat, a desktop app that runs LLMs locally. The test asked 4 models to generate self-contained canvas demos with believable motion and collisions. The scenes were not simple animations because every crash needed gravity, force, timing, and contact handling. Outputs: - Fable 5: 62,158 tokens, $3.12 - GPT 5.5: 37,753 tokens, $1.14 - Opus 4.8: 22,280 tokens, $0.56 - GLM 5.2: 36,246 tokens, $0.08

译在 atomic.chat（本地 LLM 桌面应用）的 HTML5 物理竞赛中，Fable 5 以 A+ 成绩完成全部三个场景（火车脱轨、汽车空中碰撞、怪物卡车碾压），消耗 62,158 token，成本 $3.12。相比之下，Opus 4.8 消耗 22,280 token/$0.56，GPT 5.5 消耗 37,753 token/$1.14（在怪物卡车场景中略胜 Fable），GLM 5.2 消耗 36,246 token/$0.08 但未赢得任何场景。Fable 5 质量最佳但成本最高。

elvis@omarsar0 · 1天前33

I really wish GPT-5.5 had a bit more "taste" in design and planning. For everything else related to code, it's the best model. I hope GPT-5.6 closes the gap. It would feel more complete then. For now, I switch to Opus 4.8/GLM-5.2 to fix design issues or when I plan.

译我真的希望 GPT-5.5 在设计和规划方面多一些“品味”。 在代码相关的其他方面，它是最好的模型。 我希望 GPT-5.6 能缩小差距。 那样的话感觉会更完整。 目前，我切换到 Opus 4.8/GLM-5.2 来修复设计问题或进行规划。

Perplexity@perplexity_ai · 1天前37

Claude Fable 5 is once again available in Computer as an orchestrator model.

译Claude Fable 5 再次可在 Computer 中作为编排模型使用。

Chubby♨️@kimmonismus · 1天前31

Lets freaking go! I was just about to write that Fable used up all my rates immediately. Very nice Anthropic!

译Fable 5 已准备好再次构建，Claude Devs 重置了所有人的 5 小时与每周速率限制。Kim 兴奋回应：我正要抱怨 Fable 用光了我的配额，太棒了 Anthropic！

宝玉@dotey · 1天前25

Claude Code 重置额度了，但是我亏死了，本来就要重置的

译由于Fable 5已准备好再次构建，Claude Code重置了所有用户的5小时和每周速率限制。用户吐槽自己亏大了，因为额度本来就快重置了。

Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlys · 1天前55

Claude Sonnet 5 ranks second only to Fable 5 on AA-Briefcase, our new agentic knowledge work benchmark, with a ~17x cost per task range across its five effort settings @AnthropicAI has released Claude Sonnet 5, the latest addition to the Claude Sonnet family. On AA-Briefcase, Claude Sonnet 5 (max) scores 1391 Elo, a +312 point improvement over Claude Sonnet 4.6 (max), making it the second highest scoring model behind Claude Fable 5. This gain is driven primarily by improvements in rubric scoring and analytical quality, with Sonnet 5 trailing Claude Opus 4.8 on Presentation Elo. We benchmarked all 5 available effort settings for Claude Sonnet 5: ➤ Max effort achieves the second highest AA-Briefcase Elo, but lower efforts are not Pareto efficient: Claude Sonnet 5 (max) achieves the highest AA-Briefcase score among Sonnet 5 effort settings, but lower effort settings do not reach the cost-performance Pareto frontier. Models such as Claude Opus 4.8 (max), GLM-5.2 (max), and MiniMax-M3 offer stronger cost-performance trade-offs than Claude Sonnet 5 at lower effort settings ➤ Substantially higher turn use across effort levels: Claude Sonnet 5’s higher cost is driven by an increased number of turns, with Sonnet 5 (max) averaging 183 turns per AA-Briefcase task, more than 4x that of Claude Sonnet 4.6 (max). This increase is consistent across effort levels, with Claude Sonnet 5 (medium) averaging 55 turns per task, in line with Claude Opus 4.8 with max effort AA-Briefcase is our new proprietary benchmark for agentic knowledge work. It tests models on realistic tasks across thousands of input files, requiring deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and UI mock-ups. Model performance is measured across three dimensions: binary rubric checks for ground-truth correctness, pairwise grading on analytical quality, and pairwise grading on presentation quality. The AA-Briefcase Elo is a single metric that combines results across all three dimensions

译Anthropic发布Claude Sonnet 5。在AA-Briefcase（智能体知识工作基准，测试模型处理数千文件并产出表格、演示和UI原型）上，Sonnet 5 (max)得1391 Elo，较Sonnet 4.6 (max)提升312分，排第二，仅次于Fable 5。提升来自rubric评分与分析质量，呈现仍落后Opus 4.8。max设置得分最高，但较低设置不处成本-性能帕累托前沿；Opus 4.8 (max)、GLM-5.2 (max)和MiniMax-M3在低努力下性价比更优。Sonnet 5成本较高，因turn数大增：max平均每任务183 turns（Sonnet 4.6 max的4倍多），medium平均55 turns，各设置成本跨度约17倍。

ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs · 1天前29

Now that Fable 5 is ready to build (again), we've reset everyone's 5-hour and weekly rate limits.

译由于 Fable 5 已准备好（再次）构建，我们重置了每个人的 5 小时和每周速率限制。

elvis@omarsar0 · 1天前38

There is no if. You can just combine the latest OpenAI model (even GPT-5.5) with other models like Opus-4.8 / GLM-5.2, and you are good. GPT-5.6 or the next frontier model will only elevate things further. Direct model comparison is just the wrong way to think going forward.

译没有如果。你可以直接将最新的OpenAI模型（甚至GPT-5.5）与Opus-4.8 / GLM-5.2等其他模型组合，就足够了。GPT-5.6或下一个前沿模型只会进一步提升。直接比较模型是未来错误的思考方式。

Chubby♨️@kimmonismus · 1天前15

Okay Anthropic, I forgive you for the bad Sonnet 5 launch. Fable 5 is just so much fun.

译Fable 5 回归。 用户表示：原谅 Anthropic 糟糕的 Sonnet 5 发布，Fable 5 太有趣了。