# 驳LeCun专家论：评判观点应基于论证而非学科背景

- 来源：Chubby♨️ (@kimmonismus)
- 发布时间：2026-04-19 18:16
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmo5p864a0159sl4ralu3mk52
- 原文链接：https://x.com/kimmonismus/status/2045808838641696808

## AI 摘要

针对LeCun批评Dario Amodei对技术革命与劳动力市场影响缺乏研究、主张应听从经济学家的观点，作者反驳称评判论证应基于内容真伪而非学术背景。作者指出，Amodei在Anthropic组建科学家团队形成的观点虽需批判性审视，但不应仅因学科背景被否定，以学历而非论证本身作为评判标准是不科学的。

## 正文

Lecun's argument doesn't make sense to me， and it never has. His point is that one should only listen to "experts" in specific disciplines who have studied in that field. I think that's wrong.

Why？ Arguments are examined based on the content of what is presented. One judges whether what is said is true or not， and not based on biography.

It may well be true that someone who has studied in a discipline has in-depth knowledge. But Amodei will also employ a team of scientists at Anthropic and will form an opinion.

This opinion must be critically examined. But it shouldn't be condemned simply because someone studied the "wrong" subject. *That* is unscientific.

### 引用推文

> Yann LeCun：Dario is wrong. He knows absolutely nothing about the effects of technological revolutions on the labor market. Don't listen to him, Sam, Yoshua, Geoff, or me o...