我认为学术界尚未吸收这样一个事实:AI代理现在已经足够优秀,能够在没有代码或论文本身的情况下,仅凭方法与数据独立复现复杂的论文。 它们并不完美,但错误往往出现在人类撰写的论文中,而非AI。
I think that academia has not absorbed the fact that AI agents are now good enough to independently reconstruct complex papers without access to code or the papers themselves; just the methods &; data.
They aren't perfect but the errors are often in the human paper, not the AI.