# 质疑AI教育负面研究，强调正面证据与RCT价值

- 来源：Ethan Mollick (@emollick)
- 发布时间：2026-05-04 22:13
- AIHOT 分数：49
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmorajd6r0235slru3pm3wjzj
- 原文链接：https://x.com/emollick/status/2051304153389932643

## AI 摘要

作者对一篇得出AI对教育有负面影响的论文被撤稿表示并不意外。他指出，其他经过同行评审的元分析研究发现了AI对学习的积极影响，并引用了一项具体的元分析研究作为佐证。作者强调，关于AI助益的最有力证据来自采用AI导师干预的随机对照试验（RCTs）。他引用的推文也表达了对其引用论文中积极结果的些许惊讶，这间接支持了作者对AI教育应用持审慎乐观态度的核心观点。

## 正文

My surprise here seems warranted， this paper was retracted

（There are other peer-reviewed meta-analyses of the impact of AI on education finding positive effects， like： https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387110151_The_effects_of_GenAI_on_learning_performance_A_meta-analysis_study though the best evidence of AI helping is from RCTs of interventions with AI tutors）

### 引用推文

> Ethan Mollick：(I was actually a little surprised that the results were as positive as they are) Paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-04787-y