# 《大西洋月刊》报告显示：伪科学情绪AI正侵入职场

- 来源：The Decoder：AI News（RSS）
- 作者：Maximilian Schreiner
- 发布时间：2026-05-09 15:20
- AIHOT 分数：66
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmoy0uz6f0666sllh1qor1pt9
- 原文链接：https://the-decoder.com/pseudoscientific-emotion-ai-is-invading-the-workplace-an-atlantic-report-shows

## AI 摘要

据《大西洋月刊》专题报道，声称能通过AI解读人类情绪的软件正悄然渗透日常工作场景。这类技术缺乏科学依据，却已被用于职场监控与管理，引发对员工隐私与权益的担忧。报道指出，情绪识别AI在招聘、绩效评估等环节的应用持续增加，但其准确性存在争议，可能强化偏见并导致误判。

## 正文

Pseudoscientific emotion AI is invading the workplace, an Atlantic report shows

Key Points

Employers are increasingly using "emotion AI" software to monitor and analyze workers' feelings during meetings, customer calls, and job interviews, a report in The Atlantic shows.

Experts say these tools rely on flawed science, can exhibit racial bias, and unfairly penalize employees.

The EU has banned emotion AI in the workplace, but the global market is projected to triple by 2030, raising serious concerns about invasive worker surveillance.

A feature in The Atlantic by Ellen Cushing explores how software that claims to read emotions using AI is quietly becoming a fixture of everyday work life.

Cushing tried out the service MorphCast on herself: the program analyzed her facial expressions during a meeting with her boss and determined she was generally "amused," "determined," and "interested" - though occasionally "impatient." The self-experiment serves as a jumping-off point for a broader look at a fast-growing industry operating under labels like "emotion AI" and "affective computing."

These products analyze everything from job interview video to call center audio to chat transcripts. MetLife monitors its call center agents' pitch and tone of voice, Burger King is piloting a headset chatbot called "Patty" that evaluates employee interactions for friendliness, and furniture maker Framery has tested office chairs equipped with biosensors that can measure heart rate, breathing rate, and nervousness. Slack integrations like Aware and Microsoft's Azure offer sentiment analysis of internal communications, while providers like Imentiv market emotional analysis tools for the hiring process.

Scientifically disputed, legally banned in some places

In her report, Cushing also questions the scientific foundation of these tools. Many products draw on Paul Ekman's theory of six basic emotions, which has been "widely challenged as oversimplistic and methodologically flawed" for decades. The neuroscientist Lisa Feldman Barrett is quoted as saying that movements "whether it's on your face or in your body or the tones that you emit, don't have inherent emotional meaning. They have relational meaning." In the U.S., she notes, people scowl when angry only about 35 percent of the time. A study by Lauren Rhue, the article reports, found that emotion-recognition AI judged Black NBA players to be angrier than their white teammates, "even, in some cases, if they were smiling."

The questionable science and unchecked surveillance are already causing real harm. According to a 2022 NYT investigation, social workers at UnitedHealth were downgraded for keyboard inactivity while they were talking to patients. The ACLU has alleged that the screening platform HireVue and its client Intuit denied a deaf accessibility-team employee a promotion, with the rejection email advising her to "practice active listening." Both HireVue and Intuit have disputed the claims.

The EU has already banned this kind of emotion AI in the workplace under the AI Act, with exceptions only for medical and safety purposes. MorphCast responded by moving its headquarters from Florence to the Bay Area. The global market is expected to triple to nine billion dollars by 2030, according to an estimate cited in The Atlantic.

Cushing closes with a dystopian twist: more troubling than flawed systems would be a future where the software actually works - and workers would have, on top of their actual job, "the work of making the emotion robot think that I'm sufficiently cheerful."

AI News Without the Hype – Curated by Humans