This works really well btw， at the end of your query ask your LLM to "structure your response as HTML"， then view the generated file in your browser. I've also had some success asking the LLM to present its output as slideshows， etc.

More generally， imo audio is the human-preferred input to AIs but vision （images/animations/video） is the preferred output from them. Around a ~third of our brains are a massively parallel processor dedicated to vision， it is the 10-lane superhighway of information into brain. As AI improves， I think we'll see a progression that takes advantage：

1） raw text （hard/effortful to read） 2） markdown （bold， italic， headings， tables， a bit easier on the eyes） <-- current default 3） HTML （still procedural with underlying code， but a lot more flexibility on the graphics， layout， even interactivity） <-- early but forming new good default …4，5，6，… n） interactive neural videos/simulations

Imo the extrapolation （though the technology doesn't exist just yet） ends in some kind of interactive videos generated directly by a diffusion neural net. Many open questions as to how exact/procedural "Software 1.0" artifacts （e.g. interactive simulations） may be woven together with neural artifacts （diffusion grids）， but generally something in the direction of the recently viral https：//x.com/zan2434/status/2046982383430496444

There are also improvements necessary and pending at the input. Audio nor text nor video alone are not enough， e.g. I feel a need to point/gesture to things on the screen， similar to all the things you would do with a person physically next to you and your computer screen.