# OpenAI请求法院驳回关于ChatGPT涉及"无证法律执业"的诉讼

- 来源：Rohan Paul (@rohanpaul_ai)
- 发布时间：2026-05-19 17:53
- AIHOT 分数：65
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmpcgmxl1025xslaen6yz48kp
- 原文链接：https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/2056674507042214061

## AI 摘要

针对日本生命保险公司员工使用ChatGPT大量生成法庭文件而引发的诉讼，OpenAI请求法院驳回。原告指控ChatGPT越界成为“无证法律执业者”。OpenAI辩护称，ChatGPT仅是软件工具，用户要求其起草文件不等于“执业”。案件核心在于AI辅助自我代理时责任如何界定。OpenAI主张责任在于用户和法庭监督。该事件反映了生成式AI在法庭文件撰写中的应用，既降低了参与门槛，也带来了程序混乱等新挑战。

## 正文

Reuters： OpenAI has asked a federal judge to throw out a lawsuit claiming ChatGPT crossed the line from software into unlicensed legal practice.

Nippon Life says a former employee used ChatGPT to produce a flood of court filings after settling a disability-benefits dispute， and argues OpenAI helped drive filings with no real legal purpose.

OpenAI's defense： ChatGPT is not a person， has no law license， and does not "practice law" just because a user asks it to draft arguments， motions， or research notes.

The deeper issue is where responsibility sits when an AI helps a self-represented person create legal documents that may be weak， repetitive， or procedurally wrong.

OpenAI says the user made the choices， the judge had authority over the filings， and frustration with defending a messy pro se case cannot turn a toolmaker into a lawyer.

Courts are seeing more people use generative AI to write filings， which can lower access barriers while also increasing junk motions， fake citations， and procedural confusion.

---

reuters .com/legal/transactional/openai-says-chatgpt-is-not-lawyer-asks-court-toss-insurers-lawsuit-2026-05-18/