# 播客《Agentic Review》推荐：聚焦AI编程的务实对话

- 来源：elvis (@omarsar0)
- 发布时间：2026-05-20 22:10
- AIHOT 分数：59
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmpe5wko209rsslk1w6i3upcj
- 原文链接：https://x.com/omarsar0/status/2057101547440652292

## AI 摘要

推荐QodoAI出品的播客《Agentic Review》，该节目以平衡的视角探讨AI代码生成的真实场景。通过主持人与Dexter Horthy、Scott Hanselman等嘉宾的深度对话，节目强调了上下文工程作为关键技术壁垒的重要性，并指出AI无法弥补破碎的开发流程，反而更凸显了代码审查与工程技艺的持续价值。核心观点认为，尽管编码方式可能变革，但软件开发生命周期的本质与严谨性将更加重要。节目避免了过度炒作或悲观论调，为AI工程师提供了有价值的实践参考。

## 正文

I highly recommend this.

The Agentic Review is a new podcast from @QodoAI hosted by Itamar Friedman and Nnenna Ndukwe， and it's a great AI coding show that's neither hype nor doom.

It's honest conversations about what shipping high-quality AI-generated code actually looks like.

We need more of these conversations around AI agents.

As an AI engineer， I think about this stuff constantly. A few things make this show worth your time：

* It's a conversation about what good code means in the era of coding agents.

* The hosts actually push back at guests instead of doing softball interviews.

* The current guest lineup is strong： @dexhorthy， @shanselman， and @fullstackpython.

I work a lot on context engineering， so the Dexter Horthy episode resonates the most for me. His take on context engineering as one of the biggest moats right now matches exactly what I'm seeing in production. He talks about a five-month experiment where his team stopped reading the code， then ripped it all out and rebuilt it by hand. That lesson about owning your context and actually reading what your agents produce is something every AI engineer needs to understand today.

The bigger thesis across episodes： typing code may be dying， but the SDLC， code review， and craft matter more than ever. AI sprinkled on a broken software lifecycle is "a band-aid on cancer" （Hanselman's line， and it stuck with me）.

Thanks， @QodoAI， for the partnership on this post.