# 出版业在事实核查与AI使用标准上的系统性缺失

- 来源：Ethan Mollick (@emollick)
- 发布时间：2026-05-29 00:55
- AIHOT 分数：62
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmppr3ien00dtslm65dt3cw6k
- 原文链接：https://x.com/emollick/status/2060042368078745896

## AI 摘要

推文对比了负责任的AI用法（如使用高级模型、人工复核引用）与行业现状。文章引用《纽约杂志》报道，指出媒体创业者Steven Rosenbaum在其著作《The Future of Truth》中被发现包含多条错误归因或伪造的引文，疑似由AI生成，凸显了非虚构出版业对模型幻觉的脆弱性。问题核心在于，行业长期缺乏确保事实准确的合同义务与系统性核查流程。业内人士表示漏洞普遍存在，许多AI生成的内容正被当作原创作品使用。

## 正文

This is a skill &amp； having standards issue.

I use AI in book writing. But I write the full draft of the text myself （using AI for feedback or when stuck to give options）， use advanced models that hallucinate rarely， read every reference AI finds， &amp； have multiple models check work.

### 引用推文

> New York Magazine：In May, the New York 'Times' reported that media entrepreneur Steven Rosenbaum had included "more than a half-dozen misattributed or fake quotes" in his book, "...