# 随机试验显示 GPT-4 伦理判断与人类专家持平

- 来源：Ethan Mollick (@emollick)
- 发布时间：2026-06-04 12:36
- AIHOT 分数：50
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmpz0kynj052rsli3iix28pan
- 原文链接：https://x.com/emollick/status/2062393081568076038

## AI 摘要

Ethan Mollick 引用一篇论文：四名牧师、一名拉比、十三名学者和 50 名 MBA 被要求比较《纽约时报》伦理专栏作家与 GPT-4 提出的伦理方案，结果基本持平（tie）。主推文指出，尽管 Ted Chiang 关于让 AI 做选择会导致道德萎缩的观点有一定道理，但重复随机试验发现 AI 似乎是优秀的伦理学家。

## 正文

Leaving aside the question of consciousness， the Ted Chiang piece has a reasonable point about moral atrophy if you let AI make choices.

But it is also interesting in light of the fact that repeated randomized trials find AI is apparently a good ethicist. https://x.com/emollick/status/1717198389006176519?s=20

### 引用推文

> Ethan Mollick：Sounds like a joke setup, but it is an interesting paper: Four pastors, a rabbi, thirteen academics, and 50 MBAs were asked whether they preferred the ethical s...