一项由斯坦福大学领导的盲测研究,对近3000场匿名对决的分析发现,16所法学院的法律教授在合同法问题中,有75%的时间更偏好AI生成的答案,而非教授自己写的答案,并且认为AI回答的教学危害性远低于后者(3.5% vs 12%)。 “研究团队测试了多种系统,包括商业辅导工具和Google的NotebookLM。” 现在想象6-12个月后模型的表现。
A blind Stanford-led study of nearly 3,000 anonymized matchups found law professors across 16 schools preferred AI-generated answers to student contract-law questions over those written by fellow professors 75% of the time, and judged the AI responses far less likely to be pedagogically harmful (3.5% vs. 12%).
"The team tested a range of systems, including commercial tutoring tools and Google's NotebookLM."
Now imagine the performance of models in 6-12 months.