DuMate-DeepResearch:具有递归搜索与准则推理的多智能体可审计深度研究框架
阅读原文· arxiv.orgDuMate-DeepResearch 基于千帆智能体工厂构建,将负责任务理解、规划与调度的 Agent Core 与可扩展工具生态解耦,使中间决策与工具调用可追溯。框架引入三种机制:基于图的动态规划策略实现研究路线图由粗到细扩展与持续修正;递归两层执行将复杂搜索子任务委托给内层 Search Agent,隔离噪声并稳定长程执行;基于准则的测试时优化动态生成质量标准,作为证据合成与自适应停止的推理支架。在 DeepResearch Bench 和 DeepResearch Bench II 上分别取得 58.03% 和 61.95% 的最高总分,并在信息召回与分析维度排名第一。
Deep Research (DR) has emerged as a new agentic paradigm to tackle complex, open-ended research tasks, demanding systems that can iteratively frame problems, acquire evidence, verify sources, and synthesize long-form reports. In practice, however, current DR systems are constrained by four interrelated limitations: long-horizon planning over an underspecified scope, the bottleneck of decomposing and scheduling such tasks within a single agent, hallucination risk in long-form synthesis, and limited process auditability. This technical report presents DuMate-DeepResearch, a multi-agent DR framework built on the Qianfan Agent Foundry. The framework decouples the Agent Core, which handles task understanding, planning, and scheduling, from an extensible Tool Ecosystem for retrieval, evidence acquisition, and report rendering, making every intermediate decision and tool invocation explicitly traceable. Building on this infrastructure, DuMate-DeepResearch further introduces three mechanisms: (i) a graph-based dynamic planning strategy expands the research roadmap coarse-to-fine and continuously revises it through reflection, re-planning, backtracking, and parallel branching; (ii) a recursive two-level execution design delegates each complex search sub-task to an inner Search Agent that runs its own planning loop, isolating noisy retrieval and stabilizing long-horizon execution; (iii) a rubric-based test-time optimization mechanism dynamically generates task-specific quality criteria and uses them as live reasoning scaffolds for evidence-grounded synthesis and adaptive stopping. Across two deep research benchmarks, DuMate-DeepResearch establishes new state-of-the-art results: the best overall score (58.03%) on DeepResearch Bench, and the best overall score (61.95%) on DeepResearch Bench II while ranking first in information recall and analysis.