医疗保健基准测试的质量取决于其隐含假设
阅读原文· blog.ml.cmu.eduLLM在作为医疗助手时,评估与部署场景下的性能存在显著差距——Bean等人(2025)发现准确率相差61个百分点。这一差距并非源于基准测试设计缺陷,而是因为评估协议中嵌入的隐含假设在部署时不再成立。研究提出将假设分为任务假设和结果假设两类,用以诊断差距成因并明确弥合路径:需将假设显式化、检验哪些假设在部署中成立,并据此更新评估协议。
In healthcare settings where patients use LLMs as a medical assistant, LLM performance differs between evaluation and deployment. (a) Bean et al. (2025) find a 61 percentage point difference between evaluation and deployment. (b) We argue this gap arises not from poorly designed benchmarks, but from implicit assumptions embedded in evaluation protocols that fail to hold at deployment. (c) We propose a taxonomy that categorizes assumptions into two types, task and outcome, to diagnose where the gap arises and what is required to close it. Closing the gap requires making assumptions explicit, testing which assumptions hold, and updating evaluation protocols accordingly. Healthcare LLM benchmarks are one of the main paradigms by which LLMs are evaluated prior to clinical settings. Benchmarks provide a stable goalpost that allow researchers to iterate quickly and measure progress consistently. However, in high-stakes domains like healthcare, that same abstraction becomes a liability. For example, a recent study found a 61 percentage point drop in accuracy when going from evaluation to deployment (see Figure). In this setting, patients use LLMs as a medical assistant to better understand their symptoms, identify the underlying condition, and take appropriate actions. Moreover, the results showed that patients given access to a […]