# 白宫因安全担忧要求OpenAI延缓发布新模型

- 来源：TechCrunch：AI（RSS）
- 作者：Lucas Ropek
- 发布时间：2026-06-26 07:34
- AIHOT 分数：69
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmqu57k0d01dnsl802ud03ekl
- 原文链接：https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/25/the-white-house-is-asking-openai-to-slow-roll-the-release-of-its-new-model-over-safety-concerns

## AI 摘要

OpenAI新模型GPT 5.6将不会面向公众发布，仅限少数合作伙伴预览，原因是特朗普政府要求逐客户审批访问权限。CEO Sam Altman在本周内部会议上透露，若预览效果良好，预计数周后才会进行更广泛的发布。特朗普政府此前采取“不干预”立场，但近期已推动联邦对新模型进行审查，并签署行政令要求部分AI公司在发布前自愿提交模型供政府测试。与此同时，Anthropic此前已主动将其前沿网络安全模型Claude Mythos通过Project Glasswing计划仅向有限合作伙伴开放，该模型被认为能够以远超人类分析师的速度识别和利用软件漏洞。

## 正文

OpenAI’s release of its newest model, GPT 5.6, reportedly won’t be like its previous releases. Instead of distributing it to the public, the company plans to share it only with a select group of close partners because the Trump administration told it to, reports The Information.

At a meeting this week, CEO Sam Altman reportedly told staff that the government would be “approving access customer by customer” during a preview period. Altman reportedly added that if the limited release goes well, OpenAI hopes to follow with a general, broader release a “couple of weeks later.”

In other words, the Trump administration appears to be pressuring OpenAI to do what Anthropic is already voluntarily doing: keeping its most powerful AI models under wraps.

According to The Information, OpenAI’s new model is not only being reviewed by the administration, but its staffers also “worked closely” with the government on the upcoming release. The agencies that reportedly asked for a limited release were the Oﬃce of the National Cyber Director and the Oﬃce of Science and Technology Policy.

The Trump administration — which originally positioned itself as taking a “hands off” approach to AI — has in recent months pushed for federal oversight of new models. Earlier this month, Trump signed an executive order directing certain AI companies to voluntarily submit new models to the government for testing and evaluation before releasing them publicly.

Earlier this year, Anthropic sparked no small amount of controversy when it announced that its new frontier cyber model, Claude Mythos, would only be released to a small coterie of partners through a program called Project Glasswing. Anthropic argued that its model was simply too powerful and could, in the wrong hands, cause more harm than good. Observers have since debated whether Anthropic’s rhetoric is a mere marketing gimmick or a legitimate attempt to keep a powerful model from being misused. The answer may be somewhere in between.

Cybercriminals have used automated tools for a very long time, but in the age of generative AI, they now have more digital ammunition than ever before. LLMs have proven adept at writing malware, and some can even execute entire ransomware attacks autonomously.

The specific concern with frontier cyber tools like Mythos is that they are ostensibly capable of both identifying and exploiting software vulnerabilities at speeds that no human analyst could match. Since many software systems contain hidden bugs that act as entry points into enterprise networks, this obviously poses an obvious and significant problem for any organization running complex software infrastructure. That said, since these models remain closed to the public, it’s difficult to tell just how much of a threat they really are.

Lucas Ropek

Senior Writer, TechCrunch

Lucas is a senior writer at TechCrunch, where he covers artificial intelligence, consumer tech, and startups. He previously covered AI and cybersecurity at Gizmodo. You can contact Lucas by emailing lucas.ropek@techcrunch.com.
