AI研究员Nathan Lambert发文称,因公开批评监管俘获(regulatory capture)及无意中对开源发起的攻击,他遭到比以往更多的敌意。他认为业内很少有人能自由发声,许多人私下赞同他的观点。Lambert选择在非营利组织工作、放弃大量财富,以捍卫更开放、包容、公平的AI应用未来。他并非绝对开源主义者,也不认为一切都要开源,同时不满同路人嘲笑Anthropic的行为。他强调当前更多开放性比支持封闭事业更有益。
I've been getting a lot more hate than usual as I try to speak my mind about regulatory capture / unintentional attacks on open-source.
It's pretty sad, as there are few people in AI that can speak their mind (most companies say they cannot) and I know many people agree with me silently.
I also get people saying that you only say that because it supports the outcomes you want, in a weirdly derogatory way. Of course this is true, but I'm choosing to turn down meaningful wealth so I CAN fight for these values, working at non profits to speak my mind. Building a future that is more inclusive, diverse in the application of AI, and fairer for our children.
I may not always be right, but it has been clear to me for a while that more openness right now will help way more than supporting the closed causes. I continue to re-visit this and don't think everything should be open like some of the open-source absolutists.
I also don't like a lot of my comrades making fun of anthropic, calling the people there evil, etc. Those are not the case.
Trying to stay the course!