Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai · X《华尔街日报》指出，AI对劳动力市场的影响让经济学家产生三种对立看法。弗吉尼亚大学Korinek认为AI可能逆转工业革命，使脑力与体力劳动不再稀缺。MIT教授Autor反驳软件岗位崩塌论，指过去计算机浪潮创造了新专业，提升了判断力、专业知识和人际接触的价值。耶鲁大学Gimbel批评硅谷将整洁编码工作误当作经济模型，真实工作包含混乱目标、关怀、说服和人际关系。白领“笔记本电脑职业”（法律、金融、咨询等）因工作可拆解为重复信息任务面临最明显压力。
A new WSJ piece. AI is splitting labor economists because the same evidence supports 3 futures： higher productivity with new work， painful disruption for older and mid-skill workers， or a break from wage-based income if machines become broad substitutes for human labor.
Anton Korinek （Univ of Virginia ） treats AI as a possible Industrial Revolution in reverse， because human labor became scarce after machines amplified muscles， while future AI may make both cognitive and physical labor less scarce.
David Autor （MIT professor） rejects a software jobs collapse because past computing waves killed tasks， created new specialties， and raised the value of judgment， expertise， trust， and human contact.