# 安装 Cursor iOS 应用会不可逆地更改隐私设置

- 来源：Hacker News 热门（buzzing.cc 中文翻译）
- 作者：zkldi
- 发布时间：2026-07-01 04:27
- AIHOT 分数：57
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmr13ypbw01fgsldxpo90lxzy
- 原文链接：https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737226

## AI 摘要

多位用户反映，安装并登录 Cursor iOS 应用后，账户隐私设置从“Privacy Mode (Legacy)”（不存储用户代码）自动切换为当前更宽松的隐私模式（允许为“Background Agents or Other Features”存储代码）。用户无法通过应用内菜单找回原有设置。客服承认问题，但表示无法切换回旧模式。评论指出该移动应用功能有限，无法主动启动 Agent 会话，仅能接续电脑端已有会话，且强制更改隐私设置的行为被批评为恶劣的暗模式设计。

## 正文

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

Tell HN: Installing Cursor on iOS irreversibly changes your privacy settings 97 points by zkldi1 hour ago | hide | past | favorite | 15 comments Just hit this today and I'm furious. I installed the Cursor iOS app to see what it had. I've been on Privacy Mode (Legacy) for a long time, which is the "Do not store my code" setting. A year or so ago they marked this as "Legacy" and hid it under a "Extra options" menu. They added a new Privacy Mode which is significantly more wishy-washy about what it might store - it includes a clause of "Code may be stored for Background Agents or Other Features", so I've never touched it or wanted to enable it. pic: https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/cursor1/optimized/3X/0/9/09412f800cb07a713d13c034f40eaf28e165e8f4_2_1032x1000.jpeg Upon installing and logging in to the iOS app, my account was changed to the softer Privacy Mode and the previous setting I was on has disappeared from all menus. I contacted support and they've said: > Really sorry about this. When you set up the mobile app, the prompt to turn on Cloud Agents switched you from Privacy Mode (Legacy) to our current Privacy Mode, > without making clear what that meant or that it's hard to undo. That wasn't right, and we're working on making that prompt clearer. > > To be straight with you: I'm not able to switch your account back to Privacy Mode (Legacy). The option to move back isn't available in the app today. So just a PSA I guess; do not install or set up the app if you want to keep your privacy settings. I honestly don't understand how it's legal to make logging into the iOS app change your privacy settings at all. Making the option then disappear from all menus so you can't get it back is doubly ridiculous. soared1 hour ago | next[–] That support quote is from an LLM. If you have any escalation paths (twitter, or this thread lol) there may still be a way to change it back. reply conartist61 hour ago | prev | next[–] That's about the level of respect the tech industry has for users reply jmuguy49 minutes ago | prev | next[–] The mobile app is kind of pointless anyway, imo. It cannot start an agent session on your computer, it can only be "handed off" an existing session from your computer. I don't use Cloud Agents, because for some reason they can't connect to our Linear instance. So I was only interested in using the mobile app as a proxy for my home system. reply LatticeAnimal28 minutes ago | parent | next[–] It is surprising that they went this route instead of the Claude-code route. The cloud agents are significantly more limiting. reply sbmsr49 minutes ago | prev | next[–] Wow - same happened to me earlier today and was bummed. Glad to see a public place to flag this. reply rekttrader32 minutes ago | prev | next[–] Elon’s invisible hand strikes again. reply jklm1 hour ago | prev | next[–] Happened to me too, incredibly dark pattern reply HeyMeco1 hour ago | prev | next[–] Yeah fell into the same trap. Super annoying reply cmdrmac1 hour ago | prev | next[–] This bait-and-switch with privacy is what annoys me. I get that if the software was completely free, you are the product. But if I'm paying, why can I not have a privacy policy that actually benefits me - the user? reply klibertp24 minutes ago | parent | next[–] You're probably not paying nearly enough? IDK, but pricing in tech is stretched on both ends (either way too cheap, or incredibly expensive) so much that it's hard to say anything for sure just because one is a "paying customer". reply throw123456789114 minutes ago | root | parent | next[–] > You're probably not paying nearly enough? What are the real prices then? What is the “privacy price”? reply sleepybrett1 hour ago | prev | next[–] surprise! the ai companies that stole every conceivable copywritten work to train their models doesn't want you to be able to have any privacy either. reply dbalatero38 minutes ago | parent | next[–] I suspect that while they prefer you to give up all your data, what's even more likely is they are moving fast and breaking things at a rate unseen before, and not enough conversation is happening in design phases where someone can flag that "Hey if you add this new prompt it might break an important user contract you forgot about." In either case annoying still. reply sleepybrett26 minutes ago | root | parent | next[–] just another line in the context. 'Make sure the customers have at least the same level of privacy protection that they currently have.' reply LoganDark1 hour ago | prev[–] Similarly, the Claude app for iOS tries to force you through a mandatory onboarding where you're required to set your account name among other things. I've never needed this to use the CLI or the web app so I have no idea why they think they need it on iOS. There's seemingly no way to bypass this, so on iOS I've had to use Claude in Safari. Ridiculous. reply Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact