Eric Zakariasson 分享了 Fable 在 Cursor 中的两种用法。一是作为编排器(orchestrator),将子任务分派给 Composer 2.5 并行执行,仅在设计决策、复杂 Bug 等需要整体判断时才单独使用 Fable。有效简报需包含单一关注点、足够上下文、完成定义和简短报告。二是长时云智能体(Cloud Agents)模式,用于长期重构、多端功能或跨代码库调查,通过 iOS 应用监控并适时干预。作者还建议轮换不同模型,以保持对前沿能力的认知。
http://x.com/i/article/2072636402521583616
Fable is back, here's how I use it in Cursor
Fable is back in Cursor, and here's a pattern I've been exploring and some other ways I've been getting the most out of the model.
Fable as orchestrator, Composer as workers
It's easy to put everything on a smart model. Most of an agent run is reading files, writing patches, and running checks, and you don't need Fable rates for that. Instead, let Fable decide the subtasks, the order, and whether the result is done. Composer 2.5 does the scoped pieces, cheaper and faster, and can run them in parallel. Most of my chats are short Composer runs. Fable shows up less often, but those runs go longer.