Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

2026-07-03 03:11·4小时前

AI 摘要

用户 @bridgemindai 披露一次编码会话花费 $321，其中 Fable 5 仅完成 $78（约 25%），而 Opus 4.8 被回退调用完成 $242（约 75%）。原因在于 Fable 5 的新分类器将常规编码提示误判为网络安全风险，导致大部分工作自动路由到更昂贵的 Opus 模型。Anthropic 曾称仅极少数任务会触发 fallback，但该用户实际体验与此不符。

This may be an extreme case but it still shows how quickly Fable 5 classifiers can reroute routine coding to Opus.

The session routed 75% of its work to Opus because the new classifiers kept misreading the coding prompts here as a cybersecurity issue.

BridgeMindI just paid $321 for a coding session where Fable 5 refused to do the work. Here is where the work actually went: Fable 5: $78 Opus 4.8: $242 75% of the session...

Anthropic 安全/对齐编码评测/基准

在 X 查看原推导出 Markdown

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai · X

51导出 Markdown

2026-07-03 03:11·4小时前

在 X 看原推· x.com

AI 摘要

This may be an extreme case but it still shows how quickly Fable 5 classifiers can reroute routine coding to Opus.

The session routed 75% of its work to Opus because the new classifiers kept misreading the coding prompts here as a cybersecurity issue.

BridgeMindI just paid $321 for a coding session where Fable 5 refused to do the work. Here is where the work actually went: Fable 5: $78 Opus 4.8: $242 75% of the session...