Ethan Mollick · @emollick · X·2026-07-04 02:32·60天前
AI 导读

Ethan Mollick引用推文指出当前AI使用的两极分化:极少数人用Fable或GPT-5.6等前沿模型,而多数人的AI体验仍停留在8‑30B参数级别(如Google AI Overviews、Meta AI、ChatGPT免费版、MS Copilot)。Mollick认为此现象真实存在,但更关键的是人们普遍未用这些系统做有雄心的尝试。许多模型擅长替代Google搜索或帮做作业,但真正产生影响力的,是有人将前沿AI用于长期真实问题的智能体工作。

Ethan Mollick@emollick
51AI 编辑部评分,满分 100
2026-07-04 02:32· 60天前
AI 导读

Ethan Mollick引用推文指出当前AI使用的两极分化:极少数人用Fable或GPT-5.6等前沿模型,而多数人的AI体验仍停留在8‑30B参数级别(如Google AI Overviews、Meta AI、ChatGPT免费版、MS Copilot)。Mollick认为此现象真实存在,但更关键的是人们普遍未用这些系统做有雄心的尝试。许多模型擅长替代Google搜索或帮做作业,但真正产生影响力的,是有人将前沿AI用于长期真实问题的智能体工作。

This is true… but maybe less important than the fact that people don’t try ambitious things with these systems. Many models are excellent as a Google replacement, for homework “help,” etc. It is someone’s agentic use of frontier AI on long-horizon real problems that is impactful

Peter GostevWe are now in a position where a tiny proportion of the population uses Fable or soon GPT-5.6, while everyone else's experience of AI is 8-30b-model level - Goo...