This is true… but maybe less important than the fact that people don’t try ambitious things with these systems. Many models are excellent as a Google replacement, for homework “help,” etc. It is someone’s agentic use of frontier AI on long-horizon real problems that is impactful
AI 导读
Ethan Mollick引用推文指出当前AI使用的两极分化:极少数人用Fable或GPT-5.6等前沿模型,而多数人的AI体验仍停留在8‑30B参数级别(如Google AI Overviews、Meta AI、ChatGPT免费版、MS Copilot)。Mollick认为此现象真实存在,但更关键的是人们普遍未用这些系统做有雄心的尝试。许多模型擅长替代Google搜索或帮做作业,但真正产生影响力的,是有人将前沿AI用于长期真实问题的智能体工作。
51
AI 编辑部评分,满分 100Ethan Mollick引用推文指出当前AI使用的两极分化:极少数人用Fable或GPT-5.6等前沿模型,而多数人的AI体验仍停留在8‑30B参数级别(如Google AI Overviews、Meta AI、ChatGPT免费版、MS Copilot)。Mollick认为此现象真实存在,但更关键的是人们普遍未用这些系统做有雄心的尝试。许多模型擅长替代Google搜索或帮做作业,但真正产生影响力的,是有人将前沿AI用于长期真实问题的智能体工作。
We are now in a position where a tiny proportion of the population uses Fable or soon GPT-5.6, while everyone else's experience of AI is 8-30b-model level - Goo...
来源:Ethan Mollick· x.com