# 当前LLM与优秀创意写作不兼容？

- 来源：Lee Robinson (@leerob)
- 发布时间：2026-07-04 10:29
- AIHOT 分数：56
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmr5qzl3w04s4slc7uchzmx81
- 原文链接：https://x.com/leerob/status/2073232794868756851

## AI 摘要

Lee Robinson 发文质疑当前 LLM（即使是最好的模型）能否写出人类水平的创意写作。他认为编程有可验证的奖励（编译通过、测试通过），但创意写作非常主观。自己难以通过提示词让模型写出真正优秀的非虚构作品——因为顶级写作需要长期思考和深刻洞察。他曾尝试让模型生成多个版本、再由模型委员会评分选出最佳，结果仍然是最低公分母的平庸内容。他怀疑这是技能问题，并向社区求助。

## 正文

Are current LLMs incompatible with great creative writing?

I can't tell if it's cope or not, but it seems like even with the best models, I still can't get them to write like humans would.

For coding, there is a verifiable reward like it compiling or tests passing. But for creative work like writing, it's much more subjective.

I have struggled to prompt / harness the models to write truly amazing work. They are fantastic for spell checking, grammar suggestions, and taking on different personas to read and critique work.

Maybe it's because I'm only doing nonfiction, and to write something top 0.1% means that you need to think over a long horizon and develop an interesting insight about the world. Great writing is clear thinking.

I've even asked models to try 10 different versions of a blog post, then have a council of models grade and critique the results and pick the best parts... and still I end up with this lowest common denominator slop.

Skill issue? Someone show me the way.