# Substack 上线 AI 检测工具，可识别"Claudefishing"式 AI 生成内容

- 来源：The Verge：AI（RSS）
- 作者：Emma Roth
- 发布时间：2026-07-22 03:22
- AIHOT 分数：45
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmrv2m1it01wabinvrwf743mn
- 原文链接：https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/968855/substack-pangram-ai-detecting-tool

## AI 摘要

Substack 推出由 AI 检测公司 Pangram 驱动的新工具，可扫描帖子、评论、笔记和回复，估算其中有多少文本可能由 AI 生成或辅助完成。读者在超过 100 字的内容右上角菜单中选择“Scan for AI text”即可使用。Substack 同时允许创作者添加“How I make this”声明说明写作过程，并可扫描草稿及报告不准确结果。

## 正文

The new tool can pick up on ‘Claudefishing’ across posts, comments, notes, and replies.

The new tool can pick up on ‘Claudefishing’ across posts, comments, notes, and replies.

Substack will now help users determine whether what they’re reading may have been written by AI. A new tool coming to the platform can scan posts, notes, replies, and comments to provide an estimate of how much text could be AI-generated or written with AI assistance, according to a blog post published on Tuesday.

The tool is powered by an AI detection company called Pangram and is rolling out across the web and the iOS app, with an Android launch coming “soon.” Readers can analyze content longer than 100 words by choosing the “Scan for AI text” option from the three-dot menu in the top-right corner of a post.

Image: Substack

Substack co-founder and CEO Chris Best says the Pangram integration is meant to increase transparency on the platform as AI becomes more prevalent on social media. “The core problem is not people using AI, or the quality of its output,” Best writes. “The problem is when there is a mismatch between a reader’s expectation and reality, especially when they unwittingly invest their attention in something with no human thought on the other end. That’s Claudefishing.”

In line with this change, Substack will also allow creators to explain their writing process to readers with a new “How I make this” statement. Writers can scan their drafts with Pangram, too, and will have an option to report inaccurate results.

Best notes that “Pangram can only detect whether AI was used to make the text, not whether great human care went into creating it, nor whether AI tools were used as a source.” But the goal, according to Best, is to make it easier for someone to choose to invest their time reading a blog post. “When readers have to wonder if what they’re reading is real, it undermines trust in authorship and threatens the livelihood of writers — including those who use AI tools thoughtfully to produce work they believe in,” Best writes. “Platforms that reward fakeness will create a race to the bottom.”

The FCC is planning to retroactively ban disguised DJI gadgets

China delivers a one-two punch to America’s AI dominance

The Light Flip is a minimalist flip phone with a point to prove

The Odyssey turned me into an IMAX believer

Garmin’s new screen-free fitness tracker doesn’t require a subscription

More in AI

Anthropic’s $1.5 billion book piracy settlement approved by judge

Google launches a cheaper alternative to large AI security models like Mythos

Halliday’s latest smart glasses feature a much-improved display

Anthropic’s $1.5 billion book piracy settlement approved by judge

Google launches a cheaper alternative to large AI security models like Mythos

Halliday’s latest smart glasses feature a much-improved display

Samsung can’t afford to play it safe with Apple’s first foldable looming

A touchscreen and light make the new X4 Pro the best version of Xteink’s tiny e-readers

The Light Flip is a minimalist flip phone with a point to prove