# Claude 共享聊天记录和 Artifacts 被 Google 索引，含医疗报告等敏感信息

- 来源：TechCrunch：AI（RSS）
- 作者：Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai
- 发布时间：2026-07-28 04:19
- AIHOT 分数：62
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cms3ofneo00hmro82f083gtk4
- 原文链接：https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/27/psa-your-claude-shared-chats-and-artifacts-may-have-ended-up-on-google

## AI 摘要

上周末，Reddit 用户发现通过搜索指令可在 Google 上查到大量 Claude 共享聊天记录和 Artifacts，其中包含医疗报告、公司内部文件及儿童姓名电话。Anthropic 回应称链接本身不可猜测，但用户公开分享即视为同意被第三方存档。截至周一，该索引问题已修复。

## 正文

An untold number of Claude chats and Artifacts — the interactive mini apps and documents users can build inside Claude — were found publicly searchable on Google over the weekend, after Reddit users discovered that typing search operators like “site:claude.ai/share” into Google surfaced a long list of shared conversations. Some reportedly contained health records, private company documents, and the names and phone numbers of children.

The issue appears to have originated from Claude’s “share chat” feature, which allows users to create links that enable anyone with the assigned URL view a conversation or project. “Anyone with the link can view,” warns Claude’s interface. The language clearly implies that the feature is mainly intended to allow users to share their chats with friends, colleagues, and small groups — not the whole internet. Google Docs, for example, offers a similar feature and those documents don’t end up publicly accessible on Google.

A screenshot of Claude’s “share chat” feature, when the user chooses the “Keep private” option.Image Credits:Screenshot/TechCrunch

A screenshot of Claude’s “share chat” feature, when the user chooses the “Create public link” option.Image Credits:Screenshot/TechCrunch

Anthropic appeared to blame users for the exposure. When asked about what happened, the company told TechCrunch that share links only appear in search results when they’ve been posted somewhere search engines can see, like a forum or social media post; it added that a link sent privately to someone stays out of search.

Spokeswoman Amie Rotherham added in an explainer that: “We give people control over sharing their Claude conversations publicly, and in keeping with our privacy principles, we do not share chat directories or sitemaps with search engines like Google. These shareable links are not guessable or discoverable unless people choose to share them themselves. When someone shares a conversation, they are making that content publicly accessible, and like other public web content, it may be archived by third-party services.”

The issue was first flagged by a Reddit user on Saturday and was first reported by 404 Media on Monday morning.

As of Monday afternoon, a test search by TechCrunch on Google following the method outlined in the Reddit post does not return any results, suggesting that the exposure has somehow been remediated.

Before the issue was fixed, Futurism reported finding “a detailed medical report of a real patient, clinical trial results that included patient names, documents sharing the names and phone numbers of primary school-aged children, company documents marked for internal use only, and employee reviews that included personal information about workers.”

Exposed Artifacts included code and work notes, along with erotica generated by the chatbot. In at least one case, Fortune reported, a chat labeled “shared by Anthropic” showed Claude producing explicit content, which would be a violation of the company’s own policy against generating erotica.

Anthropic’s usage policy explicitly prohibits Claude from generating sexually explicit content, and getting a chatbot to produce material against its stated guidelines — through repeated or creatively framed prompting — is a pattern that has surfaced periodically across most major AI models. It isn’t yet clear from the exposed chat how the content in question was generated, and Anthropic has not yet responded to TechCrunch’s request for comment on this specific case.

Google spokesperson Ned Adriance told TechCrunch that “Neither Google nor any other search engine controls what pages are made public on the web, and these pages were indexed across many search engines. We give site owners clear controls to decide whether pages can be crawled or indexed, and we always respect those directives.”

Last year, Forbes reported a similar issue in which hundreds of Claude chats were indexed by search engines — at the time, Google estimated it had indexed just under 600 conversations before the pages disappeared from search results. How closely the current exposure tracks that scale hasn’t been independently confirmed, though multiple users reported finding shared conversations through the same type of Google search query used to surface last year’s cache. Also last year, 404 Media reported that a researcher was able to scrape around 100,000 ChatGPT conversations that had been set to be shared publicly.

To review which Claude chats you set to have a public link, go to Settings -> Privacy -> Shared Chats.