The Verge:AI(RSS)
55AI 编辑部评分,满分 100

三大唱片公司提议:AI 歌曲须"主要由人创作"方可上榜

2026-08-01 00:36· 1天前· Terrence O’Brien
跳到正文
AI 摘要

环球音乐、索尼音乐和华纳音乐三大唱片公司联合提议,要求AI生成歌曲须满足“主要由人创作”等条件才能进入国际排行榜,否则将被排除在外。该提案比RIAA等机构此前的标签方案更进一步,还要求AI服务合规、训练数据有权属且不涉及刷榜。目前“主要由人创作”等标准尚不明确,IFPI已表态支持,但尚无排行榜组织宣布采纳。

To be eligible for the charts, songs would have to be ‘substantially human made,’ whatever that means.

To be eligible for the charts, songs would have to be ‘substantially human made,’ whatever that means.

STK467_AI_Music STK467_AI_Music

Image: The Verge / Shutterstock

Terrence O'Brien

Several record labels, including the big three — Universal Music Group, Sony Music, and Warner Music Group — have proposed rules regarding chart eligibility for AI songs. In short, they wouldn’t be.

The proposal goes quite a bit further than a labeling proposal put forth by the RIAA, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), SAG-AFTRA, and others. That would create a set of standardized labels for AI-generated and AI-assisted music. The labels’ proposal would require songs be clearly labeled, but it would also keep them off international charts unless they met specific criteria, including being “substantially human made.”

To be eligible, the songs would also have to respect the terms of service of whatever AI service was used, the model would have to have the rights to any data it was trained on, and “not raise stream or chart manipulation concerns.” What sort of concerns and what constitutes “substatially human made” are currently vague. Sony Music, UMG, and Mom+Pop Music did not immediately respond to a request for clarification.

The IFPI has thrown its weight behind the labels’ proposal, though no charting organization has signaled any immediate plan to adopt the rules, the full list of which are:

Recordings developed with generative AI services must not be included in official charts where there is reason to believe that they do not satisfy all of the following criteria:

Any generative AI services used to develop the recording are properly authorised and lawful.

They are substantially human made.

They do not raise stream or chart manipulation concerns.

They comply with applicable laws, including those relating to copyright, related rights, and personality rights.

The making available of the recordings does not breach the terms of the generative AI service used.

The use of generative AI services to develop the recording is appropriately signalled to consumers on downstream services (e.g., digital streaming platforms), in accordance with any applicable legislation and/or industry labelling standards.

More in: All the latest in AI ‘music’

Suno lost a major copyright suit in Germany.

Deezer says AI music now makes up half of all daily song uploads.

三大唱片公司提议:AI 歌曲须"主要由人创作"方可上榜

The Verge:AI(RSS)·2026-08-01 00:36·1天前·Terrence O’Brien
阅读原文· theverge.com
AI 摘要

环球音乐、索尼音乐和华纳音乐三大唱片公司联合提议,要求AI生成歌曲须满足“主要由人创作”等条件才能进入国际排行榜,否则将被排除在外。该提案比RIAA等机构此前的标签方案更进一步,还要求AI服务合规、训练数据有权属且不涉及刷榜。目前“主要由人创作”等标准尚不明确,IFPI已表态支持,但尚无排行榜组织宣布采纳。

原文 · 保持原样,未翻译

To be eligible for the charts, songs would have to be ‘substantially human made,’ whatever that means.

To be eligible for the charts, songs would have to be ‘substantially human made,’ whatever that means.

STK467_AI_Music STK467_AI_Music

Image: The Verge / Shutterstock

Terrence O'Brien

Several record labels, including the big three — Universal Music Group, Sony Music, and Warner Music Group — have proposed rules regarding chart eligibility for AI songs. In short, they wouldn’t be.

The proposal goes quite a bit further than a labeling proposal put forth by the RIAA, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), SAG-AFTRA, and others. That would create a set of standardized labels for AI-generated and AI-assisted music. The labels’ proposal would require songs be clearly labeled, but it would also keep them off international charts unless they met specific criteria, including being “substantially human made.”

To be eligible, the songs would also have to respect the terms of service of whatever AI service was used, the model would have to have the rights to any data it was trained on, and “not raise stream or chart manipulation concerns.” What sort of concerns and what constitutes “substatially human made” are currently vague. Sony Music, UMG, and Mom+Pop Music did not immediately respond to a request for clarification.

The IFPI has thrown its weight behind the labels’ proposal, though no charting organization has signaled any immediate plan to adopt the rules, the full list of which are:

Recordings developed with generative AI services must not be included in official charts where there is reason to believe that they do not satisfy all of the following criteria:

Any generative AI services used to develop the recording are properly authorised and lawful.

They are substantially human made.

They do not raise stream or chart manipulation concerns.

They comply with applicable laws, including those relating to copyright, related rights, and personality rights.

The making available of the recordings does not breach the terms of the generative AI service used.

The use of generative AI services to develop the recording is appropriately signalled to consumers on downstream services (e.g., digital streaming platforms), in accordance with any applicable legislation and/or industry labelling standards.

More in: All the latest in AI ‘music’

Suno lost a major copyright suit in Germany.

Deezer says AI music now makes up half of all daily song uploads.

阅读原文theverge.com