# 编辑需懂AI研究以拒引问题论文

- 来源：Ethan Mollick (@emollick)
- 发布时间：2026-08-04 08:19
- AIHOT 分数：29
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmsdxfftj04dwro2ei1r2l3vf
- 原文链接：https://x.com/emollick/status/2084433995534574042

## AI 摘要

Ethan Mollick 指出，AI 撰写的文章虽有一定价值，但编辑需紧跟 AI 研究，以拒绝引用方法存疑的 NANDA 论文，尤其是一年后已有更可靠企业数据时。引用推文建议新闻机构使用 AI 检测器或让熟悉 AI 的人预审稿件，并认可 Tyler Cowen 直接附上原始 AI 输出的做法。

## 正文

The article is AI written， but does make some useful points. However， editors need to be up-to-date enough on AI research to ban references to deeply methodologically suspect NANDA paper， especially a year later when we much better information about what is happening in companies

### 引用推文

> Kevin A. Bryan：News orgs need to use AI detectors, or at least have someone who uses AI preread their articles. Not a bad article! But some sections are obviously AI-written (...