# Claude Code 是最快智能体框架，但成本比最便宜对手高近三倍

- 来源：The Decoder：AI News（RSS）
- 作者：Matthias Bastian
- 发布时间：2026-08-07 00:33
- AIHOT 分数：47
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmshqt0eo0oeoronkviyjcav8
- 原文链接：https://the-decoder.com/claude-code-is-the-fastest-agent-framework-but-costs-nearly-three-times-more-than-the-cheapest-rival

## AI 摘要

Composio 用 DeepSeek V4 Flash 在 Gmail、GitHub 等真实工具上测试了四个智能体框架的 30 项任务。Claude Code 速度最快（122 秒/任务）但成本最高（$0.195/成功任务），OpenCode 最便宜（$0.073），Oh My Pi 成功率最高（17/30）但最慢（272 秒/任务）。

## 正文

The software wrapper around an AI model has a major impact on what you pay. AI tooling company Composio tested DeepSeek V4 Flash across four agent frameworks (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Oh My Pi) on 30 tasks using real-world tools like Gmail, GitHub, Slack, and Notion. No single framework won across all categories. Oh My Pi had the highest success rate (17/30) but was the slowest at 272 seconds per task. OpenCode was cheapest at $0.073 per successful task, while Claude Code was fastest at 122 seconds but most expensive at $0.195, despite using the fewest tool calls and generating the least output tokens.

Deepseek V4 Flash tested across four agent frameworks on 30 real-world tasks. Success rates were similar, but cost and speed varied widely. | Image: Composio via X

While seven tasks passed or failed based solely on which framework ran them, overall success rates stayed close. Only OpenCode trailed slightly at 14/30. The real gaps were in cost and speed, with nearly a 3x price difference and a 2.2x speed difference depending on the framework.