Ethan Mollick@emollickEthan Mollick 赞同 @deepfates 观点，认为 Fable 或 Sol 的密集术语风格并非智能低下的证据，而是缺乏心智理论（theory of mind）的表现。他指出，即使 Fableish 对 Fable 最高效，它未能理解用户不想听到晦涩的新造词，也不应让 Fableish 泄漏到面向不同受众的成品中。
I agree, even if Fableish is most efficient for Fable, it is a failure in applying theory-of-mind to the user(s).
It should know that I don't want to hear its dense neolanguage, and it should know that Fableish should not leak into the completed product for a different audience.
来源：Ethan Mollick · x.com
Ethan Mollick 赞同 @deepfates 观点，认为 Fable 或 Sol 的密集术语风格并非智能低下的证据，而是缺乏心智理论（theory of mind）的表现。他指出，即使 Fableish 对 Fable 最高效，它未能理解用户不想听到晦涩的新造词，也不应让 Fableish 泄漏到面向不同受众的成品中。
I agree, even if Fableish is most efficient for Fable, it is a failure in applying theory-of-mind to the user(s).
It should know that I don't want to hear its dense neolanguage, and it should know that Fableish should not leak into the completed product for a different audience.
来源：Ethan Mollick· x.com