Simon Willison 博客
58AI 编辑部评分,满分 100

不存在自然语言文本的无损转换:Sophie Alpert 分享工程师使用 AI 写作的内部政策

2026-08-12 07:48· 21分钟前
AI 导读

Sophie Alpert 分享了她关于工程师使用 AI 写作的“内部政策”,强调用户必须为文档中的每个观点和句子负责,不能以“AI 写的”为由推卸责任。文章指出,自然语言文本不存在无损转换,任何改写和重述都会改变原意,若由不完全理解作者意图的 AI 完成,信息必然丢失。

Sophie Alpert shares her "internal policy on acceptable use of AI writing by engineers". It's a short read (supporting its own recommendations) and really good.

If you chose to have LLMs help massage your writing the following rule seems crucial to me:

You must stand behind every idea and every sentence in your docs. It is your responsibility to make sure that the entire document is representative of your own thoughts before you share it. If a reviewer asks, “What did you mean by this line?”, it’s not acceptable to reply with “Oh sorry, AI wrote that, just ignore it.” You will confuse your readers (and waste their time) if you present them things that are not genuinely representative of your thoughts.

The "no lossless transformations" idea from the post title is expanded on here:

There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text — every rewrite and rephrase changes the meaning of your writing, and if this is done by an entity that doesn’t have the most detailed mental representation of what you personally were trying to communicate, information will be lost.

Tags: writing, ai, generative-ai, llms, ai-misuse

来源:Simon Willison 博客 · simonwillison.net

不存在自然语言文本的无损转换:Sophie Alpert 分享工程师使用 AI 写作的内部政策

Simon Willison 博客·2026-08-12 07:48·21分钟前
AI 导读

Sophie Alpert 分享了她关于工程师使用 AI 写作的“内部政策”,强调用户必须为文档中的每个观点和句子负责,不能以“AI 写的”为由推卸责任。文章指出,自然语言文本不存在无损转换,任何改写和重述都会改变原意,若由不完全理解作者意图的 AI 完成,信息必然丢失。

原文 · 保持原样,未翻译

Sophie Alpert shares her "internal policy on acceptable use of AI writing by engineers". It's a short read (supporting its own recommendations) and really good.

If you chose to have LLMs help massage your writing the following rule seems crucial to me:

You must stand behind every idea and every sentence in your docs. It is your responsibility to make sure that the entire document is representative of your own thoughts before you share it. If a reviewer asks, “What did you mean by this line?”, it’s not acceptable to reply with “Oh sorry, AI wrote that, just ignore it.” You will confuse your readers (and waste their time) if you present them things that are not genuinely representative of your thoughts.

The "no lossless transformations" idea from the post title is expanded on here:

There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text — every rewrite and rephrase changes the meaning of your writing, and if this is done by an entity that doesn’t have the most detailed mental representation of what you personally were trying to communicate, information will be lost.

Tags: writing, ai, generative-ai, llms, ai-misuse

来源:Simon Willison 博客· simonwillison.net