3D编码测试:DeepSeek-V4-Pro 耗token达Muse 48倍

Rohan Paul · @rohanpaul_ai · X·2026-08-19 06:09·16小时前
AI 导读

3D编码测试显示,DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 在构建三个体素城市场景时消耗 20,957,568 tokens,是 Muse Spark 1.2(440,279)的 48 倍,总耗时 91 分 25 秒,费用 $4.57。

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
36AI 编辑部评分,满分 100

3D编码测试:DeepSeek-V4-Pro 耗token达Muse 48倍

2026-08-19 06:09· 16小时前
AI 导读

3D编码测试显示,DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 在构建三个体素城市场景时消耗 20,957,568 tokens,是 Muse Spark 1.2(440,279)的 48 倍,总耗时 91 分 25 秒,费用 $4.57。

This 3D coding test by @thehypedotnews found DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 used 48X more tokens than Muse Spark 1.2.

thats why for agentic coding, the model's ability to reach an answer matters almost as much as the answer itself. A model that keeps reopening files, reconsidering decisions, and resending context can turn a small build into a huge inference loop.

The test used Nous Research's Hermes Agent CLI through OpenRouter, identical prompts, and the same Three.js constraints across three voxel-city scenes.

Prompt caching can suppress billing without fixing the latency and retry burden created by a call-heavy agent loop.

• total cost #1 muse spark 1.2 - $0.53 #2 gemini 3.7 flash - $0.56 #3 deepseek v4 pro - $4.57

thehype.gemini 3.7 flash vs deepseek v4 pro 0813 vs muse spark 1.2 - on voxel city dioramas three models each built three crossy road-style 3d scenes - a construction s...