生产级智能体成本剖析:非LLM组件主导延迟

DAIR.AI · @dair_ai · X·2026-08-20 00:44·6天前
AI 导读

DAIR.AI 推荐一篇关于生产级智能体成本分析的重要论文。研究发现,在十个被观测的智能体应用中,非 LLM 组件在五个应用中主导了延迟。论文提出任务感知服务可将延迟降低 29-40%,状态卸载可减少 4.6 倍内存,工具结果缓存可消除 35.2% 的冗余搜索调用。

DAIR.AI@dair_ai
37AI 编辑部评分,满分 100

生产级智能体成本剖析:非LLM组件主导延迟

2026-08-20 00:44· 6天前
AI 导读

DAIR.AI 推荐一篇关于生产级智能体成本分析的重要论文。研究发现,在十个被观测的智能体应用中,非 LLM 组件在五个应用中主导了延迟。论文提出任务感知服务可将延迟降低 29-40%,状态卸载可减少 4.6 倍内存,工具结果缓存可消除 35.2% 的冗余搜索调用。

Great paper if you are building production-grade agents.

It's a good way to understand what is actually incurring costs in your agents, which involve more complex components and decisions.

This works finds that across ten instrumented agentic applications, non-LLM components dominate latency in five of them.

How so?

Sandbox working sets peak at 28 GB per session. Task latencies inside one application diverge by up to 32x across GPU-bound inference, memory-bound retrieval, and CPU-bound sandboxes. Production sessions hold state idle for minutes to hours between active steps.

Auxiliary LLM calls and tool schema overhead form a control-plane tax that crowds out productive compute.

Task-aware serving cuts latency 29 to 40%, state offloading cuts memory 4.6x, and tool-result caching removes 35.2% of redundant search calls.

Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15127

Track more trending AI papers in our academy: https://academy.dair.ai/