编程是否已解决?Lauren Tan:远未完成

lauren · @poteto · X·2026-08-23 02:23·2天前
AI 导读

Lauren Tan 认为,若编程仅指敲代码,AI 智能体确实已解决;但编程本质是用代码解决问题,智能体缺乏约束反而制造更多问题。她强调人类工程师仍需主导方向,智能体降低了工程门槛,英语正成为新的编程语言。

lauren@poteto
45AI 编辑部评分,满分 100

编程是否已解决?Lauren Tan:远未完成

2026-08-23 02:23· 2天前
AI 导读

Lauren Tan 认为,若编程仅指敲代码,AI 智能体确实已解决;但编程本质是用代码解决问题,智能体缺乏约束反而制造更多问题。她强调人类工程师仍需主导方向,智能体降低了工程门槛,英语正成为新的编程语言。

if your definition of coding is just the act of typing code, then yes, it's solved. agents can type code faster than anyone can.

but i think most of us think of coding as the act of solving problems with code. in that definition, coding is definitely not solved. agents can generate code quickly and build whatever you want, but without the right constraints, they end up causing more problems than they solve.

i think of this like my gardening analogy. agents are like magic beans that grow in any condition, but in wild and unpredictable ways. if you put the right scaffolding around them however, they can grow into whatever shape you want.

you still want humans thoughtfully and intentionally steering this outcome. we have a name for them: engineers. agents have greatly lowered the barrier to entry to doing engineering. what was once the domain of those who understood syntax and logic is now accessible to anyone who can explain their ideas. english is a new programming language for engineering outcomes with agents.

now, even ordinary people can build impressive software. and the good ones will learn engineering through first principles. as someone who is a self-taught programmer (i first learned how to code through Excel macros!), this is incredibly exciting to me, and i can't wait to see what everyone learns and builds in this new world.

let a thousand gardens bloom!

Boris Cherny@dedene Coding is solved, bugs are not yet solved. Fix incoming