Chubby♨️ · @kimmonismus · X·2026-08-23 20:17·14小时前
AI 导读

Kim 批评 Anthropic 对 Opus 5 用户反馈的回应方式,称其将问题归咎于用户未理解正确用例,而非认真对待。用户普遍反映 Opus 5 懒惰、草率且冗长,与 Kim 自身体验一致。此前 Boris Cherny 曾建议用 Opus 做 hill climbing 优化任务,但 Kim 认为此类回应回避了核心问题。

Chubby♨️@kimmonismus
31AI 编辑部评分,满分 100
2026-08-23 20:17· 14小时前
AI 导读

Kim 批评 Anthropic 对 Opus 5 用户反馈的回应方式,称其将问题归咎于用户未理解正确用例,而非认真对待。用户普遍反映 Opus 5 懒惰、草率且冗长,与 Kim 自身体验一致。此前 Boris Cherny 曾建议用 Opus 做 hill climbing 优化任务,但 Kim 认为此类回应回避了核心问题。

With all due respect to Boris Cherny, this response is part of the problem.

The complaints about Opus 5 have become pretty consistent: it’s lazy, sloppy, and verbose. That matches my own experience. Responding that people simply haven’t understood the right use case misses the point.

It’s disappointing to see Anthropic frame user feedback this way instead of taking it seriously.

Boris Cherny@scaling01 Agree. People are sleeping on using Opus to hill climb. We use it for optimizing CPU and memory, optimizing CI times, improving frame rates, reducing...

来源:Chubby♨️· x.com