Anthropic 赢得对五角大楼供应链风险标签的首场法庭胜利

TechCrunch:AI(RSS)·2026-08-28 20:46·9小时前·Rebecca Bellan
AI 导读

加州联邦法官裁定,特朗普政府将 Anthropic 列为供应链风险属非法行为,称国防部长 Pete Hegseth 的标签构成违反第一修正案的“非法报复”,且决定“任意且反复无常”。该纠纷源于 Anthropic 在允许五角大楼将其模型用于全自主武器和大规模监控美国公民方面设定安全护栏红线。Anthropic 于三月在加州和华盛顿特区提起两起诉讼,华盛顿特区案件仍在审理中。

TechCrunch:AI(RSS)
66AI 编辑部评分,满分 100

Anthropic 赢得对五角大楼供应链风险标签的首场法庭胜利

2026-08-28 20:46· 9小时前· Rebecca Bellan
AI 导读

加州联邦法官裁定,特朗普政府将 Anthropic 列为供应链风险属非法行为,称国防部长 Pete Hegseth 的标签构成违反第一修正案的“非法报复”,且决定“任意且反复无常”。该纠纷源于 Anthropic 在允许五角大楼将其模型用于全自主武器和大规模监控美国公民方面设定安全护栏红线。Anthropic 于三月在加州和华盛顿特区提起两起诉讼,华盛顿特区案件仍在审理中。

A federal judge in California ruled on Thursday evening that the Trump administration’s designation of Anthropic as a supply chain risk was illegal. 

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin said in her ruling that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s labeling of Anthropic as a risk to national security signified “unlawful retaliation” in violation of the First Amendment, and said the decision was “arbitrary and capricious.” Lin also said Anthropic was denied due process, as required under the Fifth Amendment. 

Earlier this year, Hegseth and President Donald Trump labeled Anthropic a supply-chain risk and  ordered all federal agencies, even those outside of defense, to stop working with the Claude maker.

The dispute stemmed from Anthropic setting hard lines on certain safety guardrails that would allow the Pentagon to use its models for fully autonomous weapons and mass surveillance of American citizens. The Pentagon denied that it would use Anthropic models for anything but lawful purposes, and alleged that Anthropic could try to control the military’s use of the models it bought and paid for. 

In her ruling, Lin said that the government’s “words and deeds confirm that the challenged actions were based on a desire to make a public example out of Anthropic for its ‘arrogance’ in criticizing the government.”

She pointed out the disconnect between the supply chain label and other actions from the government, like Hegseth’s proposition to apply the Defense Production Act to Anthropic, “which would mean the company was essential to national security rather than a threat to it.” She also pointed to the Department of Defense continuing to pursue a contract with the company, and the government collaborating with the company’s new model, Mythos, for cybersecurity.

Lin also said it’s clear that Anthropic “undisputedly lacks” any backdoor access to its technology once it hands it over to the DOD. 

“Though the Department of War is undisputedly free to select the AI vendor of its choice, the evidence demonstrates that the broad measures imposed on Anthropic were illegal and baseless,” Lin wrote. “The empty invocation of national security is not a blank check to punish and retaliate against government critics,” she added.

“We welcome the court’s ruling that this supply chain risk designation was unlawful,” an Anthropic spokesperson said in a statement shared with TechCrunch. “We remain focused on working productively with the government to harness AI for our national security so all Americans benefit from this technology.”

Anthropic filed two complaints against the DOD in March in California and Washington, D.C. The D.C. suit is still ongoing. 

TechCrunch has reached out to the DOD for comment.

来源:TechCrunch:AI(RSS)· techcrunch.com