# Anthropic Max 套餐周用量与宣传不符引诉讼

- 来源：Chubby♨️ (@kimmonismus)
- 发布时间：2026-08-31 17:14
- AIHOT 分数：62
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmth104vr0fnlrochvogrbc1p
- 原文链接：https://x.com/kimmonismus/status/2094353158780666112

## AI 摘要

Anthropic 的 $200 Max 20x 套餐在 5 小时窗口内确为 Pro 的 20 倍用量，但周上限仅约为 $100 Max 5x 套餐的 2 倍，有时甚至更少。6 月提起的集体诉讼指控 Max 5x 周用量约为 Pro 的 3.5 倍，Max 20x 仅为 6-8 倍，且 Anthropic 未披露具体周上限数值。

## 正文

I went down the rabbit hole: Anthropic is already being sued over exactly this. And the $200 plan really only provides only around 2x the weekly usage of the $100 plan

Here is where the confusion comes from.

Anthropic’s pricing page says: “Choose 5x or 20x more usage than Pro.”

That naturally makes the $200 Max 20x plan sound like it includes four times the usage of the $100 Max 5x plan.

Only further down does Anthropic clarify: “Max gives you 5x or 20x more usage per 5-hour session than Pro.”

Those multipliers do not apply to the separate weekly caps, whose exact size Anthropic does not disclose.

A proposed class action filed in June alleges that Max 5x delivers around 3.5x Pro’s weekly usage, while Max 20x delivers just 6–8x. In practice, the $200 plan therefore provides only around 2x the weekly usage of the $100 plan, sometimes even less depending on the model.

The “20x” is real within each five-hour window. The weekly limit makes the overall offer look very different.

h/t @Hesamation for finding the original court files first i think

### 引用推文

> Chubby♨️：Today I learned : Claude’s $200 Max plan offers 20x Pro usage within the five-hour window, but its weekly limit is only about twice that of the $100 plan. Oh an...
