字节跳动新论文:保留尝试历史比整理成记忆摘要更有效

Rohan Paul · @rohanpaul_ai · X·2026-08-31 22:02·1天前
AI 导读

字节跳动新论文提出 Chain-of-Experience 方法,在上下文中保留先前尝试与反馈而非整理成简洁摘要。在 6 个数学、编程和知识基准上,自我反馈平均得分 71.0%,高于无反馈迭代求解的 66.8%;使用正确性或执行器反馈可达 79.3%。

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
46AI 编辑部评分,满分 100

字节跳动新论文:保留尝试历史比整理成记忆摘要更有效

2026-08-31 22:02· 1天前
AI 导读

字节跳动新论文提出 Chain-of-Experience 方法,在上下文中保留先前尝试与反馈而非整理成简洁摘要。在 6 个数学、编程和知识基准上,自我反馈平均得分 71.0%,高于无反馈迭代求解的 66.8%;使用正确性或执行器反馈可达 79.3%。

New ByteDance paper shows for test-time improvement, keeping the messy history of attempts can work better than turning that history into a neat memory summary.

Chain-of-Experience keeps earlier attempts and feedback in context, then asks the model to try again. Across 6 math, coding, and knowledge benchmarks, self-feedback averaged 71.0%, versus 66.8% with iterative solving but no feedback; correctness or executor feedback reached 79.3%.

The paper also reports 5.6% overall improvement with 19% lower API cost across tasks and models when feedback is used.

No weights change here, so this is contextual adaptation rather than persistent learning. Self-feedback also hurt on BrowseComp-Plus when solving the task required external search.

For agents, preserve the trajectory, add reliable feedback, and compress only when you know what can safely disappear.