# OpenAI 开始对部分大客户按 AI 实际完成任务效果收费

- 来源：The Decoder：AI News（RSS）
- 作者：Maximilian Schreiner
- 发布时间：2026-08-31 22:28
- AIHOT 分数：64
- AIHOT 链接：https://aihot.virxact.com/items/cmthc4ln709terodmckz4v2ko
- 原文链接：https://the-decoder.com/openai-starts-charging-some-customers-only-when-its-ai-actually-works

## AI 摘要

OpenAI 已开始为部分大客户提供按结果付费选项，即 AI 成功完成任务（如处理客服请求）后才收费，此前未公开，OpenAI 发言人拒绝置评。此举顺应了 Sierra 和 Fin 等初创公司力推的结果导向定价模式，Salesforce 也允许客户按 AI 提升收入或削减成本的程度单独议价。但该模式难点在于归因，Stripe 已发布指南，指出结果可能来自产品改动、营销或季节性因素。

## 正文

Key Points

OpenAI and other software vendors are testing outcome-based pricing. Large customers pay only once the AI completes a task successfully.

High operating costs are forcing the industry to rethink. Vendors like Salesforce now tie their prices directly to the revenue gains or cost cuts customers see.

The hard part of the model is attributing the success. Without clear rules, it's tough to prove that good results really came from the AI.

Software vendors are moving away from fixed subscription fees and billing by usage or by results instead. According to a report, OpenAI is now doing the same, according to The Information.

Over the past few months, OpenAI has started giving some large customers the option to pay only once its AI actually finishes a task, such as handling customer support requests. That's according to The Information, citing a person with direct knowledge of the arrangements. The move hadn't been public before. An OpenAI spokesperson declined to comment.

OpenAI is adopting a model that startups pushed hardest. It's outcome-based pricing, where customers pay only when the AI works. Sierra and Fin, the latter now being acquired by Salesforce for $3.6 billion, charge only for tasks the AI completes without human involvement. The coding assistant Cognition promises corporate customers credits of up to $10 million if the software fails to deliver results worth at least as much as the price they paid. Older vendors like Adobe, HubSpot, and Zendesk are heading the same way.

Why the subscription fee is under pressure

There is some pressure on the AI companies to adopt such measures, as their products are expensive to run, and so far they haven't sped up revenue growth at software companies, according to The Information. At the same time, customers' IT budgets are strained by competing tools like Anthropic's Claude, which recently pushed harder toward billing by usage.

Salesforce now lets companies choose how they pay for its own AI, Agentforce, including individually negotiated contracts tied to how much the AI lifts revenue or cuts costs. Customers want to buy and price in different ways, CEO Marc Benioff said at an investor conference. The point isn't just to say the software closed a certain number of calls and charge two dollars for them. It's to say the software raised revenue by a certain amount, so the customer should pay two dollars because the AI brought in 20 or 40.

Who gets credit becomes the sticking point

The more common the model gets, the trickier it becomes to say whether a cost saving or a closed sale came from the software or from the customer. The payment provider Stripe has already published guidelines on this. A result could come from product changes, marketing campaigns, or seasonality, Stripe notes. Without clear attribution rules, customers could dispute that the vendor drove the success.

Adobe has also said it will bill part of its newly bundled AI suite, CX Enterprise, by the value it creates, such as the number of ad campaigns completed. Adobe didn't name specific prices. Subscription and usage models stay in place for other tools, and existing AI features for photo and video editing are excluded.

The Information / OpenAI pricing model

Stripe / Outcome-based pricing