DAIR.AI 创始人分享用 Slack 智能体 Viktor 追踪 AI 论文的三周体验

elvis · @omarsar0 · X·2026-09-04 23:00·32分钟前
AI 导读

DAIR.AI 创始人 Elvis Saravia 分享用运行在 Slack 中的 AI 智能体 @viktor_com 辅助筛选每周智能体论文的体验。第一天它按请求从当周论文中挑出三篇值得读的,当天早上返回;第 19 天它在未被要求的情况下主动发消息指出新论文与课程第 4 模块的路由部分相矛盾,两天后又起草了修改并保持未发布,该模块有 2100 名学员。

elvis@omarsar0
35AI 编辑部评分,满分 100

DAIR.AI 创始人分享用 Slack 智能体 Viktor 追踪 AI 论文的三周体验

2026-09-04 23:00· 32分钟前
AI 导读

DAIR.AI 创始人 Elvis Saravia 分享用运行在 Slack 中的 AI 智能体 @viktor_com 辅助筛选每周智能体论文的体验。第一天它按请求从当周论文中挑出三篇值得读的,当天早上返回;第 19 天它在未被要求的情况下主动发消息指出新论文与课程第 4 模块的路由部分相矛盾,两天后又起草了修改并保持未发布,该模块有 2100 名学员。

I read AI papers for a living, but it has become impossible to track insights.

Every week I triage agent papers for our Top AI Papers of the Week digest.

A few weeks ago, I tried @viktor_com, an AI employee that works inside Slack, in the channel where that triage happens.

I asked it to go through the week's agent papers and pull three worth reading.

It sent the list back that same morning.

On day 19, it posted in the channel without being asked. "Six more landed overnight. One of them contradicts the routing section in module 4."

Two days later, again without me, it drafted the correction and left it unpublished. 2,100 people are on that module.

Everything it did came back as a proposal for me to approve. That is why I kept it running.

Finding new papers is easy. Knowing when one of them breaks something is much harder - in my case, the course lessons I teach.

If you run agents for weeks at a time, look closely at how the approval trail works. Happy to go deeper on this one.