Sherwin Wu 借 Bug Hunt Bench 指出 GPT-6 Astra 实际成本常低于 Fable 5.1

Sherwin Wu · @sherwinwu · X·2026-09-05 11:29·1小时前
AI 导读

OpenAI 的 Sherwin Wu 转评 @PawelHuryn 的 Bug Hunt Bench 结果指出,token 标价具有误导性,GPT-6 Astra 与 Fable 5.1 标价相同但常便宜一半以上,在该评测中便宜约 60%。

Sherwin Wu@sherwinwu
58AI 编辑部评分,满分 100

Sherwin Wu 借 Bug Hunt Bench 指出 GPT-6 Astra 实际成本常低于 Fable 5.1

2026-09-05 11:29· 1小时前
AI 导读

OpenAI 的 Sherwin Wu 转评 @PawelHuryn 的 Bug Hunt Bench 结果指出,token 标价具有误导性,GPT-6 Astra 与 Fable 5.1 标价相同但常便宜一半以上,在该评测中便宜约 60%。

In today's regime, token costs can actually be quite misleading. For example, even though Astra and Fable 5.1 have the same sticker price, Astra is often a lot cheaper – sometimes less than half the cost!

This is because Astra often uses far fewer tokens to achieve the same result. The best way to see this is by looking at evals that the community runs – you're giving the models the same set of tasks and can see how much it costs to run.

@PawelHuryn's Bug Hunt Bench below is a good example (60% cheaper!)

Sharing some other good examples below:

Paweł HurynSo, I finally tested GPT-6 Astra. 2 real repos, 105 bugs, find and fix what you can. Max effort: GPT-6 Astra: 48/105 Fable 5.1: 43/105 GPT-5.6 Sol: 42/105 Gemin...

来源:Sherwin Wu· x.com