埃隆·马斯克称山姆·奥特曼"窃取"了一家非营利组织--但庭审揭示其抱有相似目标
阅读原文· techcrunch.com陪审团迅速裁决驳回了埃隆·马斯克对OpenAI其他创始人及微软提起的诉讼。判决确认了庭审中的观察:马斯克的诉讼请求较为薄弱,部分原因在于他提起诉讼的时间拖延过久。该案件的核心指控涉及马斯克声称山姆·奥特曼“窃取”非营利组织,但庭审过程揭示,双方在推动人工智能发展的目标上存在相似之处。
The jury’s speedy decision to reject Elon Musk’s lawsuit against the other founders of OpenAI and Microsoft confirmed what we saw in the courtroom: Musk’s case was a weak one, in part because he waited so long to file it.
Watching the closing arguments last week, OpenAI’s attorneys detailed point by point how the law was on their client’s side, while the plaintiff’s team focused on Sam Altman’s apparent lack of credibility and expressed disbelief that anyone would disagree with Musk’s accusations.
The final effect was that, after the verdict, some found it hard to believe Musk had lost — including the man himself. In a post he later deleted, Musk called Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers a “terrible activist Oakland judge,” then announced his plans to appeal, declaring, “There is no question to anyone following the case in detail that Altman & Brockman did in fact enrich themselves by stealing a charity.”