Ethan Mollick@emollick

2026-06-04 12:36·28天前

AI 摘要

Ethan Mollick 引用一篇论文：四名牧师、一名拉比、十三名学者和 50 名 MBA 被要求比较《纽约时报》伦理专栏作家与 GPT-4 提出的伦理方案，结果基本持平（tie）。主推文指出，尽管 Ted Chiang 关于让 AI 做选择会导致道德萎缩的观点有一定道理，但重复随机试验发现 AI 似乎是优秀的伦理学家。

Leaving aside the question of consciousness， the Ted Chiang piece has a reasonable point about moral atrophy if you let AI make choices.

But it is also interesting in light of the fact that repeated randomized trials find AI is apparently a good ethicist. https://x.com/emollick/status/1717198389006176519?s=20

Ethan MollickSounds like a joke setup, but it is an interesting paper: Four pastors, a rabbi, thirteen academics, and 50 MBAs were asked whether they preferred the ethical s...

大佬观点安全/对齐论文/研究

在 X 查看原推导出 Markdown

Ethan Mollick@emollick · X

50导出 Markdown

2026-06-04 12:36·28天前

在 X 看原推· x.com

AI 摘要

Leaving aside the question of consciousness， the Ted Chiang piece has a reasonable point about moral atrophy if you let AI make choices.

But it is also interesting in light of the fact that repeated randomized trials find AI is apparently a good ethicist. https://x.com/emollick/status/1717198389006176519?s=20

Ethan MollickSounds like a joke setup, but it is an interesting paper: Four pastors, a rabbi, thirteen academics, and 50 MBAs were asked whether they preferred the ethical s...