Ethan Mollick · @emollick · X·2026-06-04 12:36·82天前
AI 导读

Ethan Mollick 引用一篇论文:四名牧师、一名拉比、十三名学者和 50 名 MBA 被要求比较《纽约时报》伦理专栏作家与 GPT-4 提出的伦理方案,结果基本持平(tie)。主推文指出,尽管 Ted Chiang 关于让 AI 做选择会导致道德萎缩的观点有一定道理,但重复随机试验发现 AI 似乎是优秀的伦理学家。

Ethan Mollick@emollick
50AI 编辑部评分,满分 100
2026-06-04 12:36· 82天前
AI 导读

Ethan Mollick 引用一篇论文:四名牧师、一名拉比、十三名学者和 50 名 MBA 被要求比较《纽约时报》伦理专栏作家与 GPT-4 提出的伦理方案,结果基本持平(tie)。主推文指出,尽管 Ted Chiang 关于让 AI 做选择会导致道德萎缩的观点有一定道理,但重复随机试验发现 AI 似乎是优秀的伦理学家。

Leaving aside the question of consciousness, the Ted Chiang piece has a reasonable point about moral atrophy if you let AI make choices.

But it is also interesting in light of the fact that repeated randomized trials find AI is apparently a good ethicist. https://x.com/emollick/status/1717198389006176519?s=20

Ethan MollickSounds like a joke setup, but it is an interesting paper: Four pastors, a rabbi, thirteen academics, and 50 MBAs were asked whether they preferred the ethical s...