Google 广告虚构开国元勋用 Workspace 起草《独立宣言》,AI 元素引争议
阅读原文· techcrunch.com《独立宣言》签署 250 周年之际,Google 发布一支广告,虚构开国元勋使用 Google Workspace 协作起草文件:本·富兰克林发短信催促杰斐逊,全程使用 Google Docs 协同编辑、Calendar 安排会议、Meet 远程参会(全员关摄像头),最终电子签名定稿。AI 元素包括:用“help me visualize”尝试不同国玺动物、Gemini 做会议记录、向聊天机器人咨询如何拒绝英王乔治三世的文档访问请求。YouTube 和 Instagram 反馈积极,但在 Bluesky 被批“尴尬”“缺乏时代感”;历史学家 Angus Johnston 指出“广告中真正 AI 的部分少得惊人”。
Two hundred and fifty years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence, a new commercial from Google asks: What if the Founding Fathers had access to Google Workspace?
With the tagline “Group project, but make it 1776,” the ad depicts a largely unseen Thomas Jefferson mid-draft when he gets a nagging text from Ben Franklin, leading to a very Google-centric collaboration process. Edits are suggested in Google Docs, a meeting gets scheduled in Google Calendar and conducted remotely via Google Meet (with every single attendee apparently turning their camera off?), then the whole thing is finalized with e-signatures; cue the fireworks.
Of course, since this is an ad from a tech company in the year 2026, AI has a role to play. The fictionalized founders use Google’s “help me visualize” AI tool to try out different animals on the national seal, Gemini takes notes on the meeting, and the founders also ask the chatbot for advice before declining King George III’s document access request.
The whole thing is very tongue-in-cheek (at one point, Sam Adams asks, “Can we settle this over beers?”), and the AI evangelism is relatively discreet when compared to many other recent ads. And unlike that infamous Google commercial in which a father uses Gemini to write a fan letter for his daughter, this one shies away from any suggestion that the actual text of the Declaration of Independence would be improved with AI. Perhaps the most AI-forward element of the ad is the footage itself, which to my eye has the uncanny glow of AI-generated video.
While viewer comments on YouTube and Instagram appear to be mostly positive, you may not be surprised to learn that the response on Bluesky has been far more critical. Posters declared the commercial “cringey” and “stunningly tone deaf,” and the AI angle was the biggest target — even as many users, including historian Angus Johnston, noted that it’s “amazing how little of this is actually AI.”
“Even in a corny fantasy joke, it’s impossible to make the case that AI is a useful tool for political organizing, writing, or human collaboration,” Johnston said.