xAI发布Grok 4.5

The Decoder:AI News(RSS)·2026-07-09 03:01·49天前·Matthias Bastian
AI 导读

xAI发布Grok 4.5,目标编程、智能体任务和知识工作。在Terminal Bench 2.1上得分83.3%,接近GPT 5.5(83.4%)和Fable 5(84.3%);但在DeepSWE 1.1上仅53%,落后GPT 5.5(67%)和Fable 5(70%)。Grok 4.5定价$2/百万输入token、$6/百万输出token,远低于Opus 4.8($5/$25)、Fable 5($10/$50)和GPT-5.5/5.6($5/$30),且在SWE Bench Pro上比Opus 4.8少用4.2倍token,生成速度80 token/秒。模型现已通过Grok Build、Cursor和xAI控制台可用,暂不支持欧盟,xAI计划7月中旬上线。

The Decoder:AI News(RSS)
同事件
73AI 编辑部评分,满分 100

xAI发布Grok 4.5

2026-07-09 03:01· 49天前· Matthias Bastian
AI 导读

xAI发布Grok 4.5,目标编程、智能体任务和知识工作。在Terminal Bench 2.1上得分83.3%,接近GPT 5.5(83.4%)和Fable 5(84.3%);但在DeepSWE 1.1上仅53%,落后GPT 5.5(67%)和Fable 5(70%)。Grok 4.5定价$2/百万输入token、$6/百万输出token,远低于Opus 4.8($5/$25)、Fable 5($10/$50)和GPT-5.5/5.6($5/$30),且在SWE Bench Pro上比Opus 4.8少用4.2倍token,生成速度80 token/秒。模型现已通过Grok Build、Cursor和xAI控制台可用,暂不支持欧盟,xAI计划7月中旬上线。

Image description

xAI has released Grok 4.5. The model was trained on tens of thousands of Nvidia GB300 GPUs and targets coding, agentic tasks, and knowledge work.

Benchmark results paint a mixed picture. On Terminal Bench 2.1, which tests complex command-line tasks, Grok 4.5 scores 83.3%, nearly matching GPT 5.5 (83.4%) and trailing Anthropic's Fable 5 (84.3%) by just one point.

But the gaps widen elsewhere. On DeepSWE 1.1, which measures the ability to resolve real GitHub issues, Grok 4.5 hits 53%, well behind OpenAI's GPT-5.5 at 67% and Fable 5 at 70%. On SWE Bench Pro, a curated set of harder software engineering problems, it scores 64.7%, beating Opus 4.8 (69.2% with max settings) in some configurations but falling short of Fable 5's 80.4%.

Model DeepSWE 1.1 Terminal Bench 2.1 SWE Bench Pro
Fable max 70% 84.3% 80.4%
GPT 5.5 xhigh 67% 83.4% 58.6%
Opus 4.8 max 59% 78.9% 69.2%
Grok 4.5 53% 83.3% 64.7%
GLM 5.2 44% 81.0% 62.1%

xAI says it relied on heavy data filtering, deduplication, and domain-specific selection during training to keep data quality high. The reinforcement learning stage covered hundreds of thousands of tasks, mostly from software engineering, with automated scoring. xAI built the training infrastructure for asynchronous learning, so agentic runs could stretch over many hours while training continued in parallel.

Grok 4.5 undercuts the competition on price

Grok 4.5 costs $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens. That's already far below the competition. Opus 4.8 runs $5 input and $25 output per million tokens. Fable 5 charges $10 input and $50 output per million tokens. GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 sit at $5 input and $30 output.

xAI also says Grok 4.5 uses 4.2 times fewer tokens than Opus 4.8 on SWE Bench Pro tasks and delivers results at 80 tokens per second. Lower per-token pricing and fewer tokens per task make Grok 4.5 by far the cheapest option in this performance tier, assuming the performance and efficiency gains hold up in practice.

Model Input (per 1M tokens) Output (per 1M tokens)
Grok 4.5 $2 $6
Opus 4.8 $5 $25
GPT-5.5 / GPT-5.6 $5 $30
Fable 5 $10 $50

The pricing strategy echoes what Chinese vendors like Zhipu and DeepSeek have been doing: get close enough on performance, then win on price.

Grok 4.5 is available now through Grok Build, Cursor, and the xAI console. Plugins are live for WordPowerPoint, and Excel. The model isn't available in the EU yet, with xAI targeting a mid-July launch. xAI trained Grok 4.5 alongside the code editor Cursor, which SpaceX acquired in mid-June for $60 billion in stock.